Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/453/2025 of SRI SANTHOSH R Vs SRI MUNICHANNAKESHAVA on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010190722025 NC: 2026:KHC:45596 CRL.RP No. 453 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 453 OF 2025 (397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI SANTHOSH R
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 453 OF 2025
(397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI SANTHOSH R
S/O SRI. H. RAJANNA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
R/ AT NO.512, MAHAVEER CLOVER
ANJAN COMPLEX (BYREE COMPLEX)
1ST MAIN, 13TH CROSS, MARUTHINAGAR
YELAHANKA, BANGALORE-560064
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.8/120
OLD PRIMARY SCHOOL ROAD
BENGALURU NORTH, YELAHANKA
BENGALURU- 560 064
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASANNA D P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI MUNICHANNAKESHAVA
S/O LATE SHIVASHANKAR
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS
R/ AT NO. 1041, OLD MIDDLE SCHOOL ROAD
YELAHANKA, BENGALURU- 560064
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. AJAY KUMAR M., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. K MURTHY., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
NAGARATHNA
M
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 CR.PC (FILED
U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE PASSED BY THE XVIII ADDL. CMM, BENGALURU CITY IN C.C.NO.24937/2017 AND CONFIRMED BY
THE LVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-59)
BENGALURU CITY IN CRL.A.NO.1461/2023 VIDE ITS ORDER
DATED 18.01.2025, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 138 OF N.I. ACT
AND ACQUIT THE PETITIONER
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri Prasanna D.P., learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri K.Murthy, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that the matter is settled between the parties for a sum of Rs.3,00,000/- and the petitioner has already deposited a sum of Rs.1,80,000/- before the Trial Court and, today, the petitioner has tendered a demand draft drawn on Karnataka Grameena Bank for the remaining amount of Rs.1,20,000/- payable to the respondent.
HC-KAR
3. The learned counsel for the respondent acknowledges receipt of the demand draft.
4. The Trial Court is directed to disburse the amount in deposit in favour of the respondent upon proper identification. The petitioner submits that he has no objection to such disbursement.
5. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the Criminal Revision Petition is disposed of.
6. The concurrent findings recorded by the Trial Court and confirmed by the First Appellate Court are hereby set aside.
All pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
AM List No.: 1 SL No.: 20