Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/135/2022 of SRI B P KUMAR BABU Vs J .C FLOWERS ASSETS on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010025112022 NC: 2026:KHC:45595 CRL.RP No. 135 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 135 OF 2022 (397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI B P KUMAR
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 135 OF 2022
(397(CR.PC) / 438(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI B P KUMAR BABU
S/O. MR. PRABHAKAR REDDY
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
NO. 132, SRI. VISHNU PADAM
4TH MAIN, DEFENCE COLONY
INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE 560038
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHESH S, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
J.C FLOWERS ASSETS
RE-CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED
AS ASSET RE-CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
REGISTERED U/S 3 OF SRFA ACT 2002
O/AT C G HOUSE, 12TH FLOOR
DR. ANNIE BESANT ROAD
WORLI, MUMBAI-400020
AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER
DATED: 08.07.2023
AND ALSO AT:
PRESTIGE OBELISK
MUNICIPAL NO.3, KASTURBA ROAD
BENGALURU-560 001.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SMT. POORNIMA HATTI., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by
NAGARATHNA
M
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 CR.P.C PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 08.10.2021 TAKING
COGNIZANCE AND ISSUING PROCESS TO THE PETITIONER
AND
CONSEQUENT
PROCEEDINGS
AS
AGAINST
THE
PETITIONER PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SCCH-12 XI ASCJ
AND ACMM, BANGALORE IN C.C.NO.9166/2021 FOR THE
OFFENCE P/U/S OF PAYMENT OF SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS ACT, 2007 R/W SEC.138 OF N.I ACT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo and submits that, since the respondent has withdrawn the proceedings before the Trial Court, the present petition has become infructuous. The contents of the memo read as under:
"It is submitted that the respondent has withdrawn the proceedings before the Trial Court i.e., CC No.9166/2021 and the trial court proceedings are infructuous as such the petition be dismissed as withdrawn."
HC-KAR
In view of the memo and the supporting submission, the Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE
AM List No.: 2 SL No.: 1