Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/11612/2026 of MR. C.L. NAHAR Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010526462026 NC: 2026:KHC:45656 CRL.P No. 11612 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11612 OF 2026 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: 1. MR. C.L. NAHAR S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11612 OF 2026
(482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-)
BETWEEN:
1.
MR. C.L. NAHAR
S/O SIREMALJI,
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,
R/AT NO. 121, NAGARAJA LAYOUT,
BULL TEMPLE ROAD CROSS,
OPP MARATHA HOSTEL, BASAVANAGUDI,
BENGALURU - 560 004.
REPRESENTED BY HIS SPA HOLDER,
MR. VIJAY NAHAR
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. TEJASVI K. V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU - 560 083.
REPRESENTED BY
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
MR. SANTHOSH KUMAR M,
S/O MUNIRAJU,
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
R/AT SY. NO. 17, GOTTIGERE,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI B
K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
KENCHANAHALLI, BANNERGATTA ROAD,
BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 083.
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS), PRAYING TO A. DIRECT RESPONDENT NO.1 (STATION HOUSE
OFFICER,
BANNERGHATTA
P.S)
TO
CONDUCT
A
FAIR,
IMPARTIAL,
AND
EXPEDITED
INVESTIGATION
IN
CR.NO.170/2025 AND FILE A FINAL REPORT WITHIN A TIME
FRAME STIPULATED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions and verification of the records would submit that the petitioner and respondent No.2 both have filed civil suits against each other and the issue is seemingly civil in nature. She further submits that the police after investigation have filed 'B' report before the concerned Court.
2. The issue is with regard to a compound wall allegedly constructed by the petitioner in 2016 and the
HC-KAR
construction taking place in 2024 by the supposed accused, who have allegedly trespassed over the property.
3. In light of filing of 'B' report, the remedy to the petitioner lies before the concerned Court to take the law forward by filing a protest petition or otherwise, as the case would be and also to seek for further investigation if he is so wanting.
4. With the said observations, petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
VP