Karnataka High Court
RFA/138/2021 of SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR R Vs SRI. PUTTARAJU on 24 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010066732021 NC: 2026:KHC:45548 RFA No. 138 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2021 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR R., AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, S/O
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 138 OF 2021 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR R.,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
S/O LATE H RAMAIAH,
R/AT NO. 47/6, 7TH MAIN ROAD,
NEAR SRI AMBHAMAHESHWARI TEMPLE,
KAMAKSHIPALYA,
BANGALORE - 560 079.
2.
SMT. GANGAMMA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
W/O SRI K.G. ANDANAIAH,
R/AT NO. 47/4, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
2ND CROSS, PREMNAGAR,
NEAR MUNESHWARA TEMPLE,
LAGGERE,
BANGALORE - 560 058
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. VASANTHA LAKSHMI H V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. PUTTARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
S/O SRI. H.R. SRINIVAS,
R/AT NO.140, 24TH MAIN ROAD,
SRINIVASA NAGAR,
NANDINI LAYOUT
BANGALORE - 560 096.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. ANNAIAH C V.,ADVOCATE(ABSENT))
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:26.11.2020
PASSED IN OS.No.6291/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE X
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 17.08.2026. On that day, none appeared for the appellant. However, as a last chance, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 24.08.2026.
Accordingly, the appeal is listed today. Today also, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants have no interest to prosecute the appeal further. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
HC-KAR
In view of dismissal of appeal for non-prosecution, interim order granted, if any, shall stand discharged.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5