Karnataka High Court
RFA/1314/2021 of MR SHASHIKUMAR S Vs MRS YAMUNA C J on 20 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010468782021 NC: 2026:KHC:45123 RFA No. 1314 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1314 OF 2021 (MON) BETWEEN: MR. SHASHIKUMAR S., SON OF LATE MR SHANTHARAJ F N
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010468782021
NC: 2026:KHC:45123
RFA No. 1314 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1314 OF 2021 (MON)
BETWEEN:
MR. SHASHIKUMAR S.,
SON OF LATE MR SHANTHARAJ F N
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.407,
H.Q. QUARTERS,
4TH B.N.K.S.R.P,
KORAMANGALA,
BENGALURU - 560 034.
AND ALSO RESIDING AT NO.419,
BLOCK NO.46 PWD KSRP QUARTERS,
KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 034.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. HANEEF M.H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
MRS. YAMUNA C.J.,
WIFE OF MR RAVI PRAKASH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.10 1ST BLOCK,
POLICE QUARTERS,
KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU - 560 034.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010468782021
NC: 2026:KHC:45123
RFA No. 1314 of 2021
THIS RFA FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 R/W SEC.96
OF CPC., 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED:28.10.2021 PASSED IN OS.NO.168/2017 ON THE FILE
OF THE XLII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, PARTLY DECREEING THE SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF
MONEY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal, on the premise that the entire decreetal amount has been paid by the appellant to the respondent.
2. In that view of the matter, the memo is taken on record and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
PK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8 ct-vn