Karnataka High Court

CCC/906/2025 of SRI. MUTHURAYA REDDY Vs SRI. SURENDRA K on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010471452025 NC: 2026:KHC:44588-DB CCC No. 906 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2025 BETWEEN:

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

AND

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 906 OF 2025

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI. MUTHURAYA REDDY

S/O OF LATE SRI. NANJAPPA.

AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS,

2.

SRI. M.LAKSHMIKANTHA

S/O LATE CHOWDAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

3.

SRI. LOKESH.P.B.

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

S/O LATE BYRAPPA,

4.

SRI. M.LAKSHMINARAYANA

S/O LATE MUNISWAMAPPA

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,

COMPLAINANTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE

R/AT, PAPAREDDY PALYA,

NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE,

11TH BLOCK, NISARGA ORCHARDS,

BENGALURU-560 072.

…COMPLAINANTS

(BY SRI. NAGARAJA.S., ADVOCATE)

Digitally signed by

JAI JYOTHI J

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

AND:

1.

SRI. SURENDRA.K

S/O LATE N.KRISHNAMURTHY,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.

2.

SRI. NALLAPPA.K.

S/O LATE N.KRISHNAMURTHY,

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

BOTH ARE R/AT

NALLAPPA TRANSPORT,

PAPAREDDY PALYA,

NAGARABHAVI 2ND STAGE,

BENGALURU-560 072.

3.

SMT. BHAVYA.Y.R.

D/O LATE Y.V.RANGASWAMY,

AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,

4.

SRI. VASU

HUSBAND OF SMT. BHAVYA.Y.R.

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

ACCUSED NO.3 & 4 BOTH ARE

RESIDING AT

NO.91, 1ST CROSS, 4TH MAIN,

H.V.R. EXTENSION, BASAVESHWARANAGAR,

MAGADI MAIN ROAD, OPP. CHECK POST,

BENGALURU – 560 079.

…ACCUSED

(BY SRI. C.SHANKAR REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR A1; SRI. A.RAJESH., ADVOCATE FOR A3 & A4)

THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 215 OF THE

CONSTITUTION

OF

INDIA

AND

SECTION

OF

THE

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO

HC-KAR

TAKE COGNIZANCE OF CIVIL CONTEMPT AGAINST ALL THE

ACCUSED FOR WILLFULLY DISOBEYING AND NOT COMPLYING

WITH THE ORDER OF THIS HON’BLE COURT IN RFA

NO.615/2025, DATED 17.04.2025 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

&

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

This contempt case is filed alleging disobedience of the order of this Court in RFA No.615/2025, dated 17.04.2025.

2. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the allegation is against the accused Nos.3 and 4, who are not parties to the suit. It is also not in dispute that the order of status-quo granted on 17.04.2025 is an order in the nature of an injunction. If there is any alleged violation thereof, it is for the complainant to seek its remedy under the provisions of Order 39, Rule 2A of the

HC-KAR

CPC and not under the Contempt of Courts Act. The contempt petition is therefore consigned.

Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

JJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead