Karnataka High Court

WP/25850/2026 of VIDYAVARDHAKA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010574262026 NC: 2026:KHC:44502-DB WP No. 25850 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT PETITION NO. 25850 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

AND

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

WRIT PETITION NO. 25850 OF 2026 (EDN-RES)

BETWEEN:

VIDYAVARDHAKA COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING,

P.B.NO.206, GOKULAM 3RD STAGE,

MYSURU - 570 002, KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL,

DR. B.SADASHIVE GOWDA.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI.VIKRAM HUILGOL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR

SRI.S.B.MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,

BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,

VIDHANA SOUDHA,

DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BENGALURU-560 001.

2.

THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,

HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,

(TECHNICAL EDUCATION SECTION),

BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,

M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BENGALURU-560 001.

Digitally

signed by K S

RENUKAMBA

Location:

High Court of

Karnataka

HC-KAR

3.

KARNATAKA STATE HIGHER EDUCATION COUNCIL, BY ITS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, NO.30, PRASANNA KUMAR BLOCK, K.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560 009.

4.

VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY,

BY ITS REGISTRAR, "JNANA SANGAMA"

BELAGAVI - 590 018.

5.

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION,

A STATUTORY BODY CONSTITUTED

UNDER THE ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR

TECHNICAL EDUCATION ACT, 1987,

BY ITS MEMBER SECRETARY,

NELSON MANDELA MARG,

VASANT KUNJ, NEW DELHI-110 070.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.PRATHIBA.R.K., AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI.ABHISHEK KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI.H.R.SHOWRI, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

OF

THE

CONSTITUTION

OF

INDIA

PRAYING

TO

A) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF

CERTIORARI, OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR

DIRECTION, QUASHING AND SETTING ASIDE THE GOVERNMENT

ORDER BEARING NO.ED 42 TEC 2026 DATED 02/05/2026 ISSUED BY

RESPONDENT NO.2, INSOFAR AS THE SAME HAS BEEN APPLIED, WHETHER DIRECTLY OR THROUGH THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE

AT ANNEXURE-T AND THE NOTIFICATION AT ANNEXURE-V, TO

CURTAIL THE AICTE-SANCTIONED INTAKE OF THE PETITIONER

COLLEGE AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI

and

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)

The petitioner seeks to assail the Government Order dated 02.05.2026, issued by the respondent No.2, insofar as it seeks to curtail or deny effect to the intake of 360 seats, sanctioned to the Petitioner College's Computer Science and Engineering Programme by respondent No.5, AICTE.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to a representation dated 29.06.2026, which is enclosed as Annexure-V to the writ petition, to contend that the same may be decided by the respondents.

3. The learned counsel has also referred to an order dated 12.08.2026, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.23085 of 2026 c/w. Writ Petition No.22339 of 2026, by which this Court directed the Principal Secretary to take a decision on the representations, in accordance with law.

HC-KAR

4. We have perused the order dated 12.08.2026 passed by this Court. It reads as follows: “ORAL ORDER

A common affidavit in WP.No.23085/2026 (EDN- RES) and WP.No.24949/2026 (EDN-RES), WP.No.22339/2026 (EDN-RES), WP.No.24365/2026 (EDN-RES), has been filed today in Court by the learned Additional Government Advocate, which is taken on record. It also reflects that various representations have been filed by the petitioners in the aforementioned writ petitions. In paragraph No.2 of this common affidavit, it is stated as follows:

"2. I state that in view of the representations dated 03.06.2026 with regard to petitioner in W.P.No.24365/2026, 03.06.2026 with regard to petitioner in W.P.No.24949/2026, 08.06.2026 with regard to petitioner in W.P.No.22339/2026, 01.07.2026 with regard to petitioner in W.P.No.23085/2026, to include the seats as per the AICTE approval process for the academic year 2026- 27, it is respectfully submitted that their representations shall be reconsidered in accordance with law. The copies of the above representations are produced herewith and marked as DOCUMENT NO.1 TO 4."

2. Learned Additional Government Advocate, appearing for the respondents states that a decision would be taken on or before 17.08.2026, in case this Court so directs.

3. We have perused the affidavit. It is sworned by Thulasi Maddineni, IAS, presently serving as Secretary, Higher Education Department, M.S.Building, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Veedi, Bengaluru.

4. The representations are enclosed as Document Nos.1 to 4. They are addressed respectively to:

HC-KAR

i. The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education,

ii. The Additional Chief Secretary to the Government, Department of Higher Education (Technical),

iii. The Principal Secretary Department of Higher Education

iv. The Under Secretary, Department of Higher Education, (Technical Education).

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate, states that the Competent Authority would take a decision in the matter.

6. We therefore, direct the Principal Secretary or the person holding equivalent rank (respondent No.2), in the Government of Karnataka, Department of Higher Education (Technical Education Section), to take a decision on the aforesaid representations marked as Document Nos.1 to 4 in the common affidavit filed today, in accordance with law, no later than 17.08.2026.

These writ petitions are disposed of accordingly.”

5. In view of the aforesaid, prima facie, we do not see any reason why the petitioner herein should be treated any different from the other petitioners in Writ Petition No.23085 of 2026 and other petitions.

6. The instant petition therefore, is disposed of directing the Principal Secretary, or the Officer holding equivalent rank (respondent No. 2), in the Government of

HC-KAR

Karnataka, Department of Higher Education (Technical Education Section) to take a decision on the aforesaid representation dated 29.06.2026, expeditiously and preferably before 24.08.2026.

7. Learned AGA is directed to communicate the order forthwith, to the Principal Secretary or the person holding equivalent rank as aforesaid. This petition is accordingly disposed of.

Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE

Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE

KG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead