Karnataka High Court
CCC/311/2025 of SMT. B. S. MALA Vs SHRI. JAYARAM on 19 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010175212025 NC: 2026:KHC:44594-DB CCC No. 311 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 311 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 311 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SMT. B.S.MALA,
W/O. B.S.PUTTARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
R/A NO.13, 60 FEET ROAD,
SANGOLLI RAYANNA ROAD,
AMARJOTHI NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040.
REP. BY HER GPA HOLDER
SRI.B.S.CHANNAPPA,
S/O SRI.SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
R/A NO.13, 60 FEET ROAD,
SANGOLLI RAYANNA ROAD,
AMAR JOTHI NAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 040.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SMT.LEKHA G.D., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.HARISH KUMAR C., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed
by K S
RENUKAMBA
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
SHRI. JAYARAM
THE COMMISSIONER,
BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
KUMARA KRUPA,
BANGALORE - 560 020.
…ACCUSED
(BY SMT. DEEPTI A., ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT
PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST
THE
ACCUSED
FOR
HAVING
DELIBERATELY DISOBEYED THE ORDER DATED 19.11.2020
PASSED IN W.P.NO.24060/2017(BDA) AT (ANNEXURE-A), AND
PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
Heard the learned counsel for the complainant.
2. The contempt petition has been filed on 12.03.2025 alleging deliberate disobedience of the order dated 19.11.2020 passed in Writ Petition No.24060/2017. Nowhere in the contempt petition or in any affidavit it has been contended or demonstrated that the contempt is a continuing contempt and they are entitled to maintain the same, despite the enormous delay in filing the petition. Even otherwise, we noticed that a memo has been filed on behalf of the accused in which compliance is reflected. This petition is therefore dismissed.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 14