Karnataka High Court

WP/739/2026 of M/S PREETI FOOD PRODUCTS Vs P RAMANA REDDY on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010021212026 NC: 2026:KHC:45785 WP No. 739 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. M/S PREETI FOOD PRODUCTS A REGISTERED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 739 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

M/S PREETI FOOD PRODUCTS

A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM,

HAVING REGISTERED ADDRESS AT

NO.11, 6TH CROSS,

OPPOSITE BHAVANI MANSION,

WILSON GARDEN,

BANGALORE - 560 027.

REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER

SRI. KARTHIK KRISHNAMURTHY

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. ARCHANA K.M., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

P RAMANA REDDY

S/O LATE P. LINGA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS

2.

NITHYASHREE

W/O SRI. PUNEETH

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

3.

YUVARANI RAMANA REDDY

D/O P. RAMANA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

4.

YUVALATHA RAMANA REDDY

D/O P. RAMANA REDDY

AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS

R1 AND R4 ARE RESIDING AT

NO.59/32, ALAPANA APARTMENT,

FLAT NO.D3, RAMA STREET, NUNGAMBAKKAM

CHENNAI - 600 034

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. S. KRISHNASWAMY, ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER

DATED 15/12/2025 VIDE ANNX-A PASSED ON IA NO. 1 IN OS

NO. 925 OF 2025 BY THE III ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA AND PASS AN ORDER

RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS FROM INTERFERING WITH

THE PETITIONERS PEACEFUL POSSESSION AND ENJOYMENT

OF THE SUIT SCHEDULE PROPERTY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 118

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead