Karnataka High Court

WP/24501/2026 of MRS. SUJATHA UMESH Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010544502026 NC: 2026:KHC:44628-DB WP No. 24501 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 24501 OF 2026 (GM-MM_S)

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

AND

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

WRIT PETITION NO. 24501 OF 2026 (GM-MM_S)

BETWEEN:

1.

MRS. SUJATHA UMESH

C/O UMESH

AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS

R/AT 269, 2ND CROSS ROAD

UPKAR RESIDENCY

NEAR ULLAL RTO

BANGALORE NORTH

KARNATAKA - 560 091

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. PRATHEEK R. SHETTY, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

STATE OF KARNATAKA

REP. BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

M.S. BUILDING

DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD

BENGALURU - 560 001

2.

DIRECTOR OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

DEPARTMENT MINES AND GEOLOGY

49, KHANJIA BHAVAN

RACE COURSE ROAD

BENGALURU - 560 001

Digitally

signed by

AMBIKA H B

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

3.

THE JOINT DIRECTOR

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

1 'D' CROSS, I BLOCK

RAMAKRISHNA NAGAR (DATTAGALLI)

SOUTHERN ZONE

MYSURU - 570 022

4.

SENIOR GEOLOGIST

DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY

KHANIJA BHAVAN

BESIDE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE

NEAR ZILLA PANCHAYATH

K.M.ROAD, JYOTHI NAGAR

CHIKKAMAGALURU

KARNATAKA - 577 102

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI K.S.HARISH, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND

227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT

IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS COMMANDING THE RESPONDENT

No. 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER

DATED 20.01.2025 (ANNEXURE-A), SEEKING THE BENEFIT OF

DEEMED EXTENSION FOR A PERIOD OF THIRTY YEARS UNDER

SUB-RUE(2) OF RULE 8-A OF THE KARNATAKA MINOR MINERAL

CONCESSION

(AMENDMENT)

RULES,

AND

PASS

APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE

and

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE)

1. Issue notice. The learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents.

HC-KAR

2. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that directions be issued to respondent No.4 (Senior Geologist) to consider his representation dated 20.01.2025 seeking the benefit of deemed extension for a further period of 10 years under Sub-rule

(2) of Rule 8A of the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1994 [KMMC Rules] and pass appropriate orders.

3. Sub-rule (2) of Rule 8A of the KMMC Rules provides for the deemed extension of the lease or licence for a period of 30 years for non-specified minor minerals and 50 years for specified minor minerals subject to (i) establishment of mineral availability and workability of the quarry; and (ii) all terms and conditions of lease or licences having been complied with by the licensee.

4. In the present case, it is alleged that the petitioner is engaged in illegal quarrying and has extracted and transported 64,221 metric ton of building stone without paying royalty. The said allegation is premised on a report submitted by the Karnataka State Remote Sensing Applications Centre, Bengaluru. It is alleged that the petitioner has excavated 1,39,729 metric tons of building stone.

HC-KAR

However, the DCB register indicates that only 75,508 metric tons had been transported by payment of royalty.

5. Respondent No.4 has issued a notice under Rule 44A of the KMMC Rules and called upon the petitioner to pay the amount of penalty of `30,77,558/- within a period of 180 days from the receipt of the said notice.

6. The learned Government Advocate submits that if the petitioner complies with the said notice − which is in the nature of opportunity to compound the illegal extraction and transportation of building stone − the petitioner's application for deemed extension would be considered without reference to the prior offence of illegal mining.

7. Since the said issue is outstanding, we consider it apposite to dispose of the present petition by directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation, subject to the conclusion of the issue regarding illegal mining.

8. In view of the statement made by the learned Government Advocate, we direct that in the event the petitioner complies with

HC-KAR

the demand of penalty as set out in the notice dated 13.05.2026, the allegation of illegal mining would not impede the consideration of the petitioner's application for deemed extension favourably.

9. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE

Sd/- (K.S. HEMALEKHA) JUDGE

AHB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead