Karnataka High Court
WP/24054/2026 of VENKATAPPA R Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 19 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010525862026 NC: 2026:KHC:44937 WP No. 24054 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 24054 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. VENKATAPPA R. S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 73
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 24054 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
VENKATAPPA R.
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS,
RETD.CENTRAL GOVT. OFFICER,
TECHNOLOGIST, ESI HOSPITAL,
RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE.
2.
MAMATHA G. C.
W/O VENKATAPPA R.,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
PROFESSOR AND HEAD OF THE DEPT.
AND ALSO FORMER PRINCIPAL AND SECRETARY, KARNATAKA STATE DIPLOMA IN
NURSING EXAMINATION BOARD.
BOTH ARE R/O NO.72/1, 'A' TYPE,
K.P.W.D. QUARTERS,
JEEVAN BHEEMANAGAR,
NEW THIPPASANDRA POST,
BANGALORE-560075.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SREEDHAR K., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REPRESENTED BY ITS CIRCLE
INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
RAMAMURTHYNAGAR POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE-560016.
2.
CHETHAN G.
S/O GALAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 37 YRS,
R/O BANJARA ARCADE,
NO.16, 3RD CROSS,
NEAR SPOORTHI SAGARIKA SCHOOL,
BANJARA LAYOUT, HORAMAVU,
BANGALORE-560043
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M., HCGP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH BY WRIT OF
CERTIORARI IMPUGNED FIR BEARING NO.468/2026 DATED
23.07.2026 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE
ANNEXURE-B AS THE SAME IS ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY AND
UNSUSTAINABLE AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The petitioner above named respectfully submits as follows.
1. The petitioners wish to withdraw the above petition as it cannot be adjudicated under above said category and it is learnt to be adjudicated before criminal court.
2. Hence, they may be permitted to file fresh criminal petition, in the interest of justice and equity."
Liberty so sought is granted.
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
MCR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 99