Karnataka High Court
RFA/303/2021 of SMT SHANKARAMMA M M Vs THE COMMISSIONER on 19 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010138932021 NC: 2026:KHC:44701 RFA No. 303 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303 OF 2021 (DEC) BETWEEN: SMT. SHANKARAMMA M.M., W/O SRI G. GURURAJ, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010138932021
NC: 2026:KHC:44701
RFA No. 303 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303 OF 2021 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHANKARAMMA M.M.,
W/O SRI G. GURURAJ,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.5,
18TH MAIN, MUNESHWARA BLOCK,
BANGALORE SOUTH,
BANGALORE – 560 026.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANJANNA M S., ADVOCATE(ABSENT)
AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER,
BRUHAT BENGALURU
MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BANGALORE.
2.
THE REGISTARA BIRTH AND DEATH
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE,
BANGALORE.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI
RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
12.02.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.25766/2018 ON THE FILE OF
THE XIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE
MAYOHALL UNIT, BANGALORE. DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR
DECLARATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010138932021
NC: 2026:KHC:44701
RFA No. 303 of 2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Though this Court on 01.06.2021 and 02.06.2025 directed the appellant to take steps, the Office Note indicates that in view of the orders dated 01.06.2021, 16.02.2023, 24.02.2023, 14.07.2023 and 02.06.2025, needful has not been done. This shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5 ct-vn