Karnataka High Court

MFA/4179/2024 of MASTE RAKI Vs RAMESH CHAND G on 19 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010347672024 NC: 2026:KHC:44712 MFA No. 4179 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4179 OF 2024(MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. MASTE RAKI, S/O ANANDA, AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS,

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4179 OF 2024(MV-I)

BETWEEN:

1.

MASTE RAKI,

S/O ANANDA,

AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS,

R/O SHIKARIPURA VILLAGE,

KASABA HOBLI,

NAGAMANAGALA TALUK,

MANDYA DISTRICT – 471 432.

APPELLANT BEING THE MINOR

REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL

GUARDIAN FATHER

SRI. ANANDA

S/O SOUND PURAM,

AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. MADHU M.T., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

RAMESH CHAND G.,

S/O GEESHARAMJI,

AGED MAJOR,

MAHALAKSHMI ELECTRICALS AND

HARDWARE . K G TEMPLE,

GUBBI TOWN,

TUMAKURU – 572 216.

Digitally

signed by

REKHA R

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

2.

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,

REGIONAL OFFICE, T.P HUB,

5TH AND 6TH FLOORS, KRISHI BHAVAN,

HUDSON CIRCLE, OPP BBMP,

HEAD OFFICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,

BENGALURU – 560 001.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:03.08.2023

PASSED IN MVC NO. 155/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII

ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, C/c X

ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-16), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM

PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT

OF COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

Though this Court ordered notice on 23.06.2026, office note states that the notice not issued to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for want of PF. This shows claimant is not interest in prosecuting the appeal.

HC-KAR

Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead