Karnataka High Court
MFA/4179/2024 of MASTE RAKI Vs RAMESH CHAND G on 19 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010347672024 NC: 2026:KHC:44712 MFA No. 4179 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4179 OF 2024(MV-I) BETWEEN: 1. MASTE RAKI, S/O ANANDA, AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4179 OF 2024(MV-I)
BETWEEN:
1.
MASTE RAKI,
S/O ANANDA,
AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS,
R/O SHIKARIPURA VILLAGE,
KASABA HOBLI,
NAGAMANAGALA TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT – 471 432.
APPELLANT BEING THE MINOR
REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL
GUARDIAN FATHER
SRI. ANANDA
S/O SOUND PURAM,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MADHU M.T., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
RAMESH CHAND G.,
S/O GEESHARAMJI,
AGED MAJOR,
MAHALAKSHMI ELECTRICALS AND
HARDWARE . K G TEMPLE,
GUBBI TOWN,
TUMAKURU – 572 216.
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
2.
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
REGIONAL OFFICE, T.P HUB,
5TH AND 6TH FLOORS, KRISHI BHAVAN,
HUDSON CIRCLE, OPP BBMP,
HEAD OFFICE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
BENGALURU – 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:03.08.2023
PASSED IN MVC NO. 155/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE VIII
ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, C/c X
ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE AND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU (SCCH-16), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT
OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Though this Court ordered notice on 23.06.2026, office note states that the notice not issued to respondent Nos.1 and 2 for want of PF. This shows claimant is not interest in prosecuting the appeal.
HC-KAR
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7