Karnataka High Court
RFA/370/2021 of SRI.G.VENKATESH Vs SMT.R.MAHALAKSHMI on 19 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010190462021 NC: 2026:KHC:44703 RFA No. 370 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2021 (EJE) BETWEEN: SRI. G.VENKATESH, S/o SRI. M. GOPAL, AGED ABOUT 47
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010190462021
NC: 2026:KHC:44703
RFA No. 370 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 370 OF 2021 (EJE)
BETWEEN:
SRI. G.VENKATESH,
S/o SRI. M. GOPAL,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT No.1483, GROUND FLOOR,
17TH ‘A’ MAIN,
J.P. NAGAR, 2ND PHASE,
BENGALURU - 560 078.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. MANJUNATHA H., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT.R.MAHALAKSHMI,
W/o SRI. H.R.YATHIRAJ,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
R/AT No.833,
16TH MAIN,17TH CROSS,
BSK II STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 070.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. A.G. RAVIKUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 R/W
SECTION 96 OF CPC, 1908, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED:18.03.2021 PASSED IN OS.No.7256/2014 ON
THE FILE OF THE XIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EJECTMENT.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010190462021
NC: 2026:KHC:44703
RFA No. 370 of 2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a Memo stating that the respondent has taken physical possession of the property pending disposal of the appeal. In that view of the matter, the appeal becomes infructuous and sought to withdraw the appeal as having rendered infructuous.
2. The Memo is taken on record and accepting the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as having rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8 ct-vn