Karnataka High Court
CCC/499/2025 of SRI RANGANATHA Vs SRI RAVIRAJ S KUMAR on 19 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010291812025 NC: 2026:KHC:44760-DB CCC No. 499 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 499 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 499 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
SRI. RANGANATHA
S/O. MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/AT. KADE MANE,
1ST A CROSS, BEHIND VIVEKA VIDHYALAYA,
SRI. SHIVAKUMARASWAMY LAYOUT,
ANDRAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
TIGALARAPALYA, BENGALURU-560 058.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. DEEPAK.M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. RAVIRAJ.S.KUMAR
S/O. M.SHIVAKUMAR ALIAS
MEGADAHALLI DR.SHIVAKUMAR,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 41, 3RD CROSS,
AKSHAYA NAGAR EAST,
YELENAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BEGUR, BENGALURU-560 068.
2.
SRI. M.SHIVAKUMAR ALIAS MEGADAHALLI
DR SHIVAKUMAR,
S/O. LATE MAHADEVIAH,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.41, 3RD CROSS,
Digitally signed
by SUMATHY
KANNAN
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AKSHAYA NAGAR EAST,
YELENAHALLI MAIN ROAD,
BEGUR, BENGALURU-560 068.
…ACCUSED
(ACCUSED NOS.1 & 2 ARE SERVED)
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 10 & 12 OF THE
CONTEMPT OF COURTS, ACT, 1971, BY THE COMPLAINANT, WHEREIN PRAYS THAT THE HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED
TO INITIATE APPROPRIATE PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE
ACCUSED PERSONS FOR WILFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE
COMPROMISE DECREE AND ORDER DATED 21.04.2023 PASSED
IN O.S.NO.2510/2023 HON’BLE CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE, CCH-18 AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED PERSONS
ACCORDING TO LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
&
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
A compromise decree and order dated 21.04.2023 is stated to have been produced. However, from the record it appears that the compromise decree has not been produced. Thus, there is no decree of the Court before us.
2. Be that as it may, if the compromise decree does exist, it may be executable. Non-compliance by a
HC-KAR
party to the compromise agreement would not give rise to a cause for initiating contempt proceedings.
2. There is no cause for interference in this petition. It is accordingly consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16