Karnataka High Court
WP/24866/2026 of SRI Y C ESHWAR REDDY Vs SMT. RENUKAMMA on 18 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010547242026 NC: 2026:KHC:44601 WP No. 24866 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24866 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI Y.C.ESHWAR REDDY S/O Y.C. SANDEEP REDDY
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 24866 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI Y.C.ESHWAR REDDY
S/O Y.C. SANDEEP REDDY
AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO. 1010,
ABOVE CORPORATION BANK,
26TH MAIN ROAD,
JAYANAGAR 4TH T BLOCK,
BANGALORE-49
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. V.G.BHANUPRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. RENUKAMMA
W/O LATE BASAVAIAH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
2.
SMT. BABY @ SUMA
D/O LATE. BASAVAIAH,
W/O SHIVARAJ
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
3.
SRI. SIDDARAJU J.B,
S/O LATE. BASAVAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
4.
SMT. LAKSHMIDEVI J.B.
D/O LATE. BASAVAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
ALL ARE RESIDING AT
GADARANAHALLI VILLAGE,
MARALAVADI HOBLI,
HAROHALLI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT,
NOW BANGALORE SOUTH DISTRICT-562 121
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN
O.S.NO.728/2026 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA AND SET ASIDE
THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE TRAIL COURT VIDE
ORDER DATED 25.07.2026 PASSED ON I.A. NO.1 FILED UNDER
SECTION 151 AND ORDER 39 RULE 1 AND 2 OF CPC IN
O.S.NO.728/2026, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KANAKAPURA. (ANNEXURE- A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The present writ petition is filed questioning the order dated 25.07.2026 passed in I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.728/2026 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kanakapura.
HC-KAR
2. Earlier, the petitioner came before this Court challenging the order of the trial Court where the suit summons were issued. This Court directed the trial Court to consider the application within one week, notwithstanding the fact that the suit summons had not been served on the defendants. After that, the present impugned order was passed. In that order, the trial Court also did not consider the application. It is stated that, without giving notice, this case cannot be heard and that notice must be issued, despite an order passed by this Court to decide the application. This Court has called for a report. A report has been placed before this Court stating that, by oversight, such an order was passed. Considering the report given by the learned Judge, this Court deems it appropriate to pass the following order:
ORDER
i. The order dated 25.07.2026 passed in I.A.No.1 in O.S.No.728/2026 by the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Kanakapura, is set aside.
ii. The trial Court shall strictly consider I.A.No.1 seeking injunction in accordance with law within
HC-KAR
a period of one week from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.
iii. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
iv. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI ) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 38