Karnataka High Court
MFA/7977/2023 of VINODA. S. E. Vs GOPI. R on 18 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010629142023 NC: 2026:KHC:44115 MFA No. 7977 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7977 OF 2023(MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. VINODA. S. E., W/O. SOMASHEKARAPPA. K, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7977 OF 2023(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
VINODA. S. E.,
W/O. SOMASHEKARAPPA. K,
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
2.
KEERTHI. K.,
S/O. SOMASHEKARAPPA. K,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
3.
KIRAN. K. S.
S/O. SOMASHEKARAPPA. K,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/O. NO. 338,
2ND CROSS, LBS NAGARA,
SHIVAMOGGA CITY - 577 204.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. SREE HARSHA A.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
GOPI. R.,
S/O. RANGANATH,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
R/O. HONNAVILE,
BIDRE POST,
SHIVAMOGGA TALUK - 577 222.
(OWNER CUM DRIVER CENTER
LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION
Digitally
signed by
REKHA R
Location:
High Court
of Karnataka
HC-KAR
NO. KA-14A-6175)
2.
THE BRANCH MANAGER,
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
2ND FLOOR, S.S.COMPLEX,
B.H.ROAD,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.
POLICY NO. 610600311710018805,
VALID DATED 31.07.2017 TO 30.07.2018.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SRIKANTH PATIL K., ADVOCATE FOR R1, SRI. S.V. HEGDE MULKHAND, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:22.06.2023
PASSED IN MVC NO.249/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I
ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM AND MEMBER, MACT, SHIVAMOGGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
AND
SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT
OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
2
Decisions referred to
In this index
1
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal by the claimant assailing the finding of the Tribunal fastening the entire liability on the insured on the premise that the driver of the offending vehicle was not possessing valid and effective licence, arising out of the judgment and award dated 22.06.2023 in MVC No.249/2023 passed by the I Addl. Senior civil Judge and CJM, & Motor Accident Claim Tribunal at Shivamogga1.
2. Heard Sri.Sree Harsha A.K., learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Sri.Srikanth Patil K., learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 and Sri.S.V.Hegde Mulkhand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2.
3. Though this appeal is by the claimant seeking for enhancement of compensation and the finding of the Tribunal fastening the entire liability on the insured on the premise that the driver of the offending vehicle was not 1 Hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal' for short
HC-KAR
possessing valid and effective driving licence, he restricts his appeal only to the finding of the Tribunal contending that the Tribunal has awarded appropriate compensation, however, the finding fastening the liability on the insured is against the settled position of law by the Supreme Court in the case of PAPPU DEO YADAV VS. NARESH KUMAR AND OTHERS2 and in the case of NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED vs. SWARAN SINGH AND OTHERS3.
4. Though Sri.Hegde Mulkund argued in support of the judgment, he is not in serious dispute with the settled position of law. He submits that he may be permitted to pay the compensation with liberty to recover the amount from the insured in view of law the laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the cases stated supra.
5. Considering the rival submissions, this Court is of the opinion that in view of the settled position of law, 2 (2022) 13 SCC 790 3 (2004) 3 SCC 297
HC-KAR
the insurer is primarily made liable to pay the compensation with liberty to recover the same from the insured.
7. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The appeal is allowed in part, the findings exonerating the liability of the Insurer is modified.
(ii) The insurer is directed to primarily pay the entire compensation along with interest awarded by the Tribunal within six weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order before the concerned Tribunal, with liberty to recover the same from the insured.
(iii) On deposit, the entire amount shall be disbursed in terms of the order of
HC-KAR
apportionment and disbursement passed by the Tribunal.
(iv) Trial Court Records received, if any, shall be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal forthwith without causing any delay.
(v) No order as to costs.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 ct-vn