Karnataka High Court
WP/13806/2026 of SMT GAYTRI Vs MRS SUMITRA on 18 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010311162026 NC: 2026:KHC:44981 WP No. 13806 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 13806 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GAYTRI D/O LATE T. KRISHNAPPA, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 13806 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. GAYTRI
D/O LATE T. KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
2.
SMT. NAGAVENI
D/O LATE T.KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
3.
SMT.MANJULA.K
D/O LATE T.KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
4.
SMT. CHANDRAVADANA
D/O LATE T.KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
5.
SMT.K.HEMAVATHI
D/O LATE T.KRISHNAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
ALL ARE RESIDNG AT
NO.26/3, NEW GURAPPANA PALYA,
BANERGHATTA ROAD,
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SOMASEKHAR NAIDU B, ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
MRS. SUMITRA
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
W/O LATE.JOSEPH,
RESIDING AT NO.63/2, DEVANAHALLI,
BENGALURU RURAL - 562 110.
REPRESENTED BY ITS G.P.A HOLDER,
MR. AMANULLA,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.6/1 AND 2,
2ND FLOOR, GANAPATHIPURA,
CHUNCHAGHATTA MAIN ROAD,
J.P NAGAR, 7TH PHASE, KONANAKUNTE,
BENGALURU - 560 062.
2.
MR. B. SHAIK MAHABOOB
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
S/O BAKASH,
RESIDING AT NO.58/5/5, D CROSS,
MADER SAB LAYOUT,
NEW GURAPPANA PALYA,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ADITYA M.R, ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT HON'BLE TRAIL
COURT TO CONSIDER I.A. NO. 6/2026 UNDER ORDER 1 RULE
10 (2) FILED BY THE PETITIONERS IN O.S. NO. 2400/2026 ON
THE FILE OF THE CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE (CCH-40)
AT BANGALORE DATED 23.04.2026 MARKED AS ANNEXURE S.
AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Submission is placed on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
All I.As in the petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 112