Karnataka High Court
CRP/835/2025 of SRI RAJU M Vs SMT MANJULA on 18 August 2026
NC: 2025:KHC:31981 WP No. 19051 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 19051 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI RAJU M S/O LATE SRI. MUDDAVEERAPAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/ A NO.
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC:31981
WP No. 19051 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 19051 OF 2025 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI RAJU M
S/O LATE SRI. MUDDAVEERAPAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/A NO. 1196, 22ND 'A' MAIN,
11TH CROSS, SECTOR-1,
HSR LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560 102
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAN S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT MANJULA
D/O LATE SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA,
W/O SRI. BASAVARAJU
AGED ABOURT 40 YEARS,
R/A THIGALARAPALYA,
HAMLET OF ESUVANAHALLI,
DODDABELE POST,
THYAMAGUNDALU HOBLI,
NELMANGALA TALUK,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT- 562132.
2.
SRI. GANGAIAH H.
S/O LATE SRI. HANUMANTHARAYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
3.
SMT. MADHURA T.V.
W/O GANGANNA H @ GANGAIAH H
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed
by NAGAVENI
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
NC: 2025:KHC:31981
WP No. 19051 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE ORDER DATED 19-04-2025 PASSED ON I.A NO.2
IN O.S. NO. 857/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, TUMAKURU, PRODUCED AT
ANNEXURE-E CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION I.A
NO.2 FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11 (A)
AND (D) OF CPC AND REJECT THE PLAINT AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner calls in question the rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11 (a) and (d) of Code of Civil Procedure. The order is revisable and not to be challenged in petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, the petitioner is permitted to convert the subject proceedings to a civil revision petition.
2. For statistical purpose, the petition stands disposed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 290 Page No.02 is retyped and replaced vide chamber order dated 18.10.2025