Karnataka High Court

MFA/3248/2023 of LAKSHMAMMA Vs PRASANNAKUMAR. S on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010248572023 NC: 2026:KHC:44110 MFA No. 3248 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3248 OF 2023(MV-I) BETWEEN: LAKSHMAMMA, W/O. ALTEHUCHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3248 OF 2023(MV-I)

BETWEEN:

LAKSHMAMMA,

W/O. ALTEHUCHAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

COOLIE, R/O 5TH CROSS,

RIGHT SIDE MALAVAGOPPA,

SHIVAMOGGA. TALUK - 577 201.

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. SREE HARSHA A K., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

PRASANNAKUMAR. S.,

S/O SUBRAMANI,

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,

R/O NO 41A, NEW COLONY,

NEAR BANEKRISHNA CIRCLE,

BHADRAVATHI - 577 245.

(OWNER OF TAT SUNO BEARING

REGN.NO. KA-14/A-98693)

2.

KIRANKUMAR A. @ KIRAN,

S/OARMUGAM. G.

AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,

Digitally

signed by

REKHA R

Location:

High Court

of Karnataka

HC-KAR

R/O INDRAMMANILAYA,

BYPASS ROAD,

NEW SIDDAPURA,

BHADRAVATHI - 577 245.

3.

THE BRANCH MANAGER,

UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO,LTD,

RUB BUILDING, B.H.ROAD,

SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201.

(POLICY NO.2404023117P119099204.

VALID DATE 31.03.2018 TO 30.03.2019)

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. S.V. HEGDE MULKHAND, ADVOCATE FOR R3, VIDE ORDER DATED 21.06.2024 NOTICE TO R1

AND R2 ARE DISPENSED WITH)

THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:05.11.2022

PASSED IN MVC NO. 393/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE I

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE AND ADDITIONAL MACT-I, SHIVAMOGGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR

COMPENSATION

AND

SEEKING

ENHANCEMENT

OF

COMPENSATION.

THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal by the claimant seeking enhancement of compensation arising out of judgment and award dated 05.11.2022 in MVC No.393/2019 passed by the I Addl. District Judge and Addl. MACT-I, at Shivamogga1.

2. The parties are referred to as per their ranking before the tribunal.

3. Facts germane to file the present appeal are as under:

In an accident occurred on 11.12.2018 at about 7.30 a.m., the claimant, a sexagenarian, suffered grievous injuries resulting in 31% disability. The claimant has suffered comminuted distal femur fracture right side with tibia plateau fracture of right leg and she underwent ORIF with distal femur bicolumnar plating with ORIF with lateral condyle plate and screws on 27.12.2018. The claimant had undergone surgery for fixation of plating with ORIF

1 Hereinafter referred to as 'Tribunal' for short

HC-KAR

and was admitted on 2 occasions for a total period of 42 days as inpatient. The doctor, who has been examined as PW2, has stated that the injuries has resulted in 31% disability to a particular limb.

4. The Tribunal though considered the income of the claimant as per the Chart prepared by the Karnataka State Legal Services Authority for the year 2018 at Rs.12,500/- per month and considered the disability at 10% being 1/3rd of 31%, awarded appropriate compensation under the head 'loss of future income', however, while awarding the compensation under other heads except medical expenses, transportation and attendant charges, has awarded inadequate compensation. The claimant aggrieved by the inadequate compensation, is before this Court seeking enhancement.

5. Heard Sri.Sree Harsha A.K., learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Sri.S.V.Hegde Mulkhand, learned counsel appearing for the respondent

HC-KAR

No.3/insurer. Notice of this appeal on respondent Nos.1 and 2 is dispensed with vide order dated 21.06.2024.

6. Both the counsel argued against and supporting the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal in respect of quantum. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the quantum of compensation awarded under the heads except the one stated above are inadequate and requires reconsideration. Whereas, the learned counsel for the insurer submits that the compensation awarded is just and proper and there is no chance of enhancement of compensation.

7. This Court after perusing the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal is of the opinion that the compensation awarded under the other heads, which are now sought to be enhanced, requires reconsideration, when compared to injuries and disability resulted. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to reassess the compensation as under:

HC-KAR

Sl. No. Particulars Compensation awarded by the Tribunal Compensation awarded by this Court

Pain and Sufferings Rs.60,000/- Rs.1,00,000/-

Medical expenses Rs.14,050/- Rs.14,050/-

Future medical expenses -- --

Loss of income including future prospects on account of permanent disability Rs.1,05,000/- Rs.1,05,000/-

Loss of earning during laid up period Rs.25,000/- Rs.50,000/-

Transportation and attendant charges Rs.20,000/- Rs.20,000/-

Food and nourishment Rs.15,000/- Rs.25,000/-

Loss of amenities of life Rs.10,000/- Rs.50,000/-

Total Rs.2,49,050/- Rs.3,64,050/-

8. Accordingly, the claimant is entitled for enhanced compensation of Rs.1,15,000/-, which shall carry interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization.

9. For the reasons aforesaid, this Court proceeds to pass the following:

ORDER

(i) The appeal is allowed in part.

(ii) The judgment and award dated 05.11.2022 in MVC No.393/2019 passed by the I Addl. District Judge and Addl. MACT-I, at

HC-KAR

Shivamogga, is modified and enhanced to Rs.1,15,000/- along with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization.

(iii) The respondent No.3/insurer shall deposit the entire enhanced compensation along with interest before the Tribunal, within six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

(iv) On deposit, the entire amount including the interest, shall be released in favour of the claimant on due identification.

(v) Trial Court Records received, if any, shall be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal forthwith without causing any delay.

(vi) No order as to costs.

Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE

DR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5 ct-vn

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead