Karnataka High Court
CCC/1167/2025 of B A SUBRAMANYA Vs MANIVANNAN P on 18 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010591292025 NC: 2026:KHC:44104-DB CCC No. 1167 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1167 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
AND
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 1167 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
B.A.SUBRAMANYA
S/O B.S.ASWATHANARAYANA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/A: NO.1424, 23RD MAIN,
B.S.K. 2ND STAGE,
BENGALURU - 560 070.
…COMPLAINANT
(BY SRI. P.N.HARISH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
MANIVANNAN P
THE COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,
T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 020.
…ACCUSED
(BY SRI.VACHAN.B., ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION IS FILED UNDER
SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURT ACT, BY
THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO TAKE THE COGNIZANCE OF
THE CONTEMPT COMMITTED BY THE ACCUSED IN NOT
OBEYING THE DIRECTION CONTAINED IN THE ORDER DATED
04.12.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS
Digitally
signed by K S
RENUKAMBA
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.29450/2024(BDA) AND TRY THE
ACCUSED FOR THE CONTEMPT AND PUNISH THE ACCUSED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND FURTHER PASS APPROPRIATE
ORDER DIRECTING THE ACCUSED TO IMPLEMENT THE ORDER
DATED 04.12.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE
OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN W.P.NO.29450/2024 (BDA) AND
PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDER/ ORDERS AS THE
HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT APPROPRIATE IN THE FACTS AND
CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION, COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI
and
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI)
This petition is filed alleging disobedience of the order dated 04.12.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.29450/2024. The operative part of the order of reads as follows: “5. Taking into consideration the prolonged litigation addressed by the petitioner herein would indicate that, the respondent – BDA has not taken decision in the matter. However, in the ends of justice, the petitioner is permitted file one more comprehensive representation to the respondent – BDA within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and same shall be considered by the respondent – BDA within two months, thereafter, taking into consideration the grievance urged by the petitioner herein and the orders passed by this court in the above
HC-KAR
referred writ petitions. With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of.”
2. It is admitted by the learned counsel for the complainant that a comprehensive representation filed by the complainant before the Commissioner has been rejected by means of an endorsement dated 13.03.2026.
3. In this view of the matter, the order passed by the learned Single Judge, has been complied with. The contempt petition is consigned.
Sd/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE
Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE
KG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10