Karnataka High Court

WP/25771/2026 of V K DEVELOPERS Vs T S UMESH on 18 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010567292026 NC: 2026:KHC:44405 WP No. 25771 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 25771 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. V.K.DEVELOPERS REPRESENTED BY ITS

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 25771 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

V.K.DEVELOPERS

REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETRIX

V. P. PUSHPA,

HAVING OFFICE AT NO.34,

2ND FLOOR, VSK PLAZA,

2ND CROSS, JOURNALIST COLONY,

JC ROAD,

BENGALURU -560 002

2.

MRS. V.P PUSHPA

W/O MR. PURSHOTHAM,

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS

RESIDING AT NO. 417,

18TH MAIN, 4TH T BLOCK,

JAYANAGAR,

BENGALURU-560 041

3.

MR. PURUSHOTHAM,

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO. 417,

18TH MAIN, 4TH T BLOCK,

JAYANAGAR,

BENGALURU-560 041

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. SUHAIL AHMED E., ADVOCATE)

AND:

T.S.UMESH

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

S/O SRI. T.R SHVAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.1-102/2,

2ND CROSS, 3RD MAIN ROAD,

1ST PHASE, 5TH STAGE,

BEML LAYOUT, RAJESHWARINAGAR,

BENGALURU-560 098

…RESPONDENT

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER ON

I.A. NO. II DATED 12.06.2026 PASSED BY THE III ADDL.

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT IN O.S.

NO.150/2024 (VIDE ANNEXURE A).

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a Civil Revision Petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition within two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.

HC-KAR

5. The registry is directed to return all the documents by retaining the xerox copies.

6. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI ) JUDGE

PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 124

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead