Karnataka High Court

CRP/387/2015 of SRI KRISHNAPPA Vs SRI.SYED NOORUDDIN AHMED on 17 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010511982015 NC: 2026:KHC:44072 CRP No. 387 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 387 OF 2015 BETWEEN: SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE DUGGANA BHOVI AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 387 OF 2015

BETWEEN:

SRI KRISHNAPPA

S/O LATE DUGGANA BHOVI

AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,

R/AT.KOMMENAHALLI VILLAGE,

BUDIKOTE HOBLI,

BANGARPET TALUK - 563 115

KOLAR

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI.SYED NOORUDDIN AHMED

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

2.

SYED NAJMUDDIN

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

3.

MALIKA BEGUM

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

4.

SYED NASEERUDDIN AHMED

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,

5.

MOHAMMADI BEGUM

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

6.

SYED MOINUDIN

AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,

RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF

SRI. B.S. ZIAUDDIN, RESIDING AT #3292,

SHAHAB NAGAR, SAIT COMPOUND,

BANGARPET - 563 115

7.

7A.

KHURSHEED UNNISA W/O M.A. SAMAD,

DEAD BY LRS.,

SRI. MOHAMED FAROOQ S.

S/O LATE M.A.SAMAD

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

7B.

SRI. MUSHATAQ AHMED.S

S/O LATE M.A.SAMAD

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,

7C.

SRI. EJAZ AHMED.S

S/O LATE M.A. SAMAD

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,

7D.

SRI. SAJJAD AHMED S.

S/O LATE M.A. SAMAD

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

7E.

SMT. KANEER FATHIMA

@ HUMERA BEGUM,

W/O C.A. RAHMATHULLA KHAN

S/O LATE M.A. SAMAD

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

7F. SMT. SABIRA BANU

W/O SYED EHSANULLA

S/O LATE M.A.SAMAD

AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,

RESPONDENTS NO.7A TO 7F ARE

HC-KAR

RESIDING AT #3436, NEAR DENTAL CLINIC,

SHAHAB NAGAR, SAIT COMPOUND,

BANGARPET - 563 115

8.

SMT. KHAMRUNNISA @ MUMTAZ BEGAM,

W/O MOHD. KAZIM,

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

R/AT #282, 26TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS,

II STAGE, B.T.M. LAYOUT,

BANGALORE-76

9.

AHMADI BEGUM

W/O ASMATHULLA BAIG @ NAWAB,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

31/1, II FLOOR, OPP: TO CHURCH,

COCKBURN ROAD,

BANGALORE-51

10.

SRI. AMARESH

S/O LATE SUBBAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,

LR OF GANGAMMA

11.

SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR

S/O LATE CHENNAMMAIAH,

AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,

12.

SRI. SHASHIKUMAR

S/O. LATE CHENNAMMAIAH

AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS

13.

MASTER MURALI

S/O SMT. SARASAMMA

AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS,

14.

SANDHYA

D/O SMT. SARASAMMA

HC-KAR

AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS,

RESPONDENTS NO.13 AND 14 ARE MINORS

REPRESENTED BY SRI. AMARESH

BEING THE NATURAL GUARDIAN

RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 14 ARE

R/AT KOMMENAHALLI, BUDIKOTE HOBLI,

BANGARPET TALUK

SRI.C.R.MOHAMMED USMAN

S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN

AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,

DEAD AND HENCE DELETED AND NO LR'S

15.

SMT.LAXMI DEVI

W/O RAVI

AGED 37 YEARS

KOMMENAHALLI, BUDIKOTE HOBLI,

BANGARPET TALUK

SINCE SMT. LAXMI DEVI WAS NOT A PARTY, IN

ORIGINAL SUIT AND VIDE ORDER DATED

11.03.2019 HER NAME IS DELETED

AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 11.03.2019,

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE FOR

R1 TO R5, R7 (A TO F), R8 AND R9.

R10, R11, R12, R13 AND R14 ARE SERVED)

THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE

JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.06.2015 PASSED IN

MISC.APPEAL NO.2/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF)

DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER

DATED 28.09.2013 PASSED IN MISC.NO.15/2008 ON THE FILE

OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE KGF DISMISSING THE

HC-KAR

MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.15/2008 UNDER ORDER 9 RULE

13 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC TO SET ASIDE THE EX-PARTE

JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN OS.NO.68/2003 DATED

30.09.2004.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

SMC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead