Karnataka High Court
CRP/387/2015 of SRI KRISHNAPPA Vs SRI.SYED NOORUDDIN AHMED on 17 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010511982015 NC: 2026:KHC:44072 CRP No. 387 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 387 OF 2015 BETWEEN: SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE DUGGANA BHOVI AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 387 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
SRI KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE DUGGANA BHOVI
AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS,
R/AT.KOMMENAHALLI VILLAGE,
BUDIKOTE HOBLI,
BANGARPET TALUK - 563 115
KOLAR
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI.SYED NOORUDDIN AHMED
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
2.
SYED NAJMUDDIN
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
3.
MALIKA BEGUM
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
4.
SYED NASEERUDDIN AHMED
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
5.
MOHAMMADI BEGUM
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
6.
SYED MOINUDIN
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6 ARE CHILDREN OF
SRI. B.S. ZIAUDDIN, RESIDING AT #3292,
SHAHAB NAGAR, SAIT COMPOUND,
BANGARPET - 563 115
7.
7A.
KHURSHEED UNNISA W/O M.A. SAMAD,
DEAD BY LRS.,
SRI. MOHAMED FAROOQ S.
S/O LATE M.A.SAMAD
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
7B.
SRI. MUSHATAQ AHMED.S
S/O LATE M.A.SAMAD
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
7C.
SRI. EJAZ AHMED.S
S/O LATE M.A. SAMAD
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
7D.
SRI. SAJJAD AHMED S.
S/O LATE M.A. SAMAD
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
7E.
SMT. KANEER FATHIMA
@ HUMERA BEGUM,
W/O C.A. RAHMATHULLA KHAN
S/O LATE M.A. SAMAD
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
7F. SMT. SABIRA BANU
W/O SYED EHSANULLA
S/O LATE M.A.SAMAD
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.7A TO 7F ARE
HC-KAR
RESIDING AT #3436, NEAR DENTAL CLINIC,
SHAHAB NAGAR, SAIT COMPOUND,
BANGARPET - 563 115
8.
SMT. KHAMRUNNISA @ MUMTAZ BEGAM,
W/O MOHD. KAZIM,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
R/AT #282, 26TH MAIN, 7TH CROSS,
II STAGE, B.T.M. LAYOUT,
BANGALORE-76
9.
AHMADI BEGUM
W/O ASMATHULLA BAIG @ NAWAB,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
31/1, II FLOOR, OPP: TO CHURCH,
COCKBURN ROAD,
BANGALORE-51
10.
SRI. AMARESH
S/O LATE SUBBAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS,
LR OF GANGAMMA
11.
SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR
S/O LATE CHENNAMMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,
12.
SRI. SHASHIKUMAR
S/O. LATE CHENNAMMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS
13.
MASTER MURALI
S/O SMT. SARASAMMA
AGED ABOUT 11 YEARS,
14.
SANDHYA
D/O SMT. SARASAMMA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.13 AND 14 ARE MINORS
REPRESENTED BY SRI. AMARESH
BEING THE NATURAL GUARDIAN
RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 14 ARE
R/AT KOMMENAHALLI, BUDIKOTE HOBLI,
BANGARPET TALUK
SRI.C.R.MOHAMMED USMAN
S/O LATE ABDUL REHMAN
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
DEAD AND HENCE DELETED AND NO LR'S
15.
SMT.LAXMI DEVI
W/O RAVI
AGED 37 YEARS
KOMMENAHALLI, BUDIKOTE HOBLI,
BANGARPET TALUK
SINCE SMT. LAXMI DEVI WAS NOT A PARTY, IN
ORIGINAL SUIT AND VIDE ORDER DATED
11.03.2019 HER NAME IS DELETED
AMENDED VIDE ORDER DATED 11.03.2019,
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MOHAMMED SHAFIULLA, ADVOCATE FOR
R1 TO R5, R7 (A TO F), R8 AND R9.
R10, R11, R12, R13 AND R14 ARE SERVED)
THIS CRP IS FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 18.06.2015 PASSED IN
MISC.APPEAL NO.2/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE KOLAR (SITTING AT KGF)
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER
DATED 28.09.2013 PASSED IN MISC.NO.15/2008 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE KGF DISMISSING THE
HC-KAR
MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.15/2008 UNDER ORDER 9 RULE
13 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC TO SET ASIDE THE EX-PARTE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED IN OS.NO.68/2003 DATED
30.09.2004.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 84