Karnataka High Court
WP/20859/2026 of SRI B.R PRAKASHACHARI Vs SRI. M .R RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI M R on 17 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010457342026 NC: 2026:KHC:44073 WP No. 20859 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 20859 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI B.R. PRAKASHACHARI S/O SRI B G RATNACHAR,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 20859 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI B.R. PRAKASHACHARI
S/O SRI B G RATNACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT HIRENALLUR VILLAGE AND POST,
KADUR TALUK,
CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 550
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. HARINI B.R., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. R.B. SADASIVAPPA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. M.R. RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI M R
S/O LATE SRI RUDRAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
R/AT MELENALLI VILLAGE,
HIRENALLUR POST,
HIRENALLUR HOBLI, KADUR TALUK,
CHICKMAGALURU DISTRICT - 577 131
2.
SRI H S NIJAGUNA
S/O LATE SRI SIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
R/AT KOTE BADAVANA,
KADUR TOWN, KADUR TALUK,
CHICKMAGALUR DISTRICT - 577 101
…RESPONDENTS
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALLING FOR THE
RECORDS OF EXE. PET. NO.79/2016 AND O.S. NO.377/2014
FROM THE FILE OF THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND
JMFC AT KADUR AND2. BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE
IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 12/06/2026 VIDE ANNEXURE A
PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KADUR ON I.A. NO.3 IN EXE. PET. NO.79/2016 AND GRANT
SUCH OTHER ORDER OR DIRECTIONS AS THIS HONBLE COURT
DEEMS FIT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order.
HC-KAR
4. The Registry is directed to return all the documents to the petitioner, after retaining photocopies thereof.
5. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 92