Karnataka High Court
WP/23967/2026 of SRIRAM REDDY M K Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010525872026 NC: 2026:KHC:44180 WP No. 23967 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 23967 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRIRAM REDDY M K S/O KONAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010525872026
NC: 2026:KHC:44180
WP No. 23967 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 23967 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRIRAM REDDY M K
S/O KONAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
R/O 11/1, 7TH MAIN ROAD,
NAGARAJALAYOUT,
KAVALBYRASANDRA,
RT NAGAR POST,
BANGALORE-560032
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SREEDHAR K.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
RAMAMURTHYNAGAR POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE-560016
2.
CHETHAN G
S/O GALAPPA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
R/O BANJARA ARCADE,
NO.16, 3RD CROSS,
NEAR SPOORTHI SAGARIKA SCHOOL,
BANJARA LAYOUT, HORAMAVU,
BANGALORE-560043
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.K NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP)
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010525872026
NC: 2026:KHC:44180
WP No. 23967 of 2026
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH BY WRIT OF
CERTIORARI
IMPUGNED
FIR
BEARING
NO.468/2026
DATED
23/07/2026 ON THE FILE OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT VIDE
ANNEXURE-B
AS
THE
SAME
IS
ILLEGAL,
ARBITRARY
AND
UNSUSTAINABLE AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
"The petitioner above named respectfully submits as follows:
1. The petitioner wishes to withdraw the above petition as it cannot be adjudicated under above said category and it is learnt to be adjudicated before criminal court.
2. Hence, he may be permitted to file fresh criminal petition, in the interest of justice and equity."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn. Sd/-
(M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 60