Karnataka High Court
RFA/1939/2021 of V SUBRAMANI Vs MR VENKATA REDDY on 17 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010496372021 NC: 2026:KHC:44050 RFA No. 1939 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1939 OF 2021 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. V SUBRAMANI S/O MR.K.VENKATESH, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1939 OF 2021 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1.
V SUBRAMANI
S/O MR.K.VENKATESH,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
NO.3B, II A CROSS, RAJIV GANDHI NAGAR,
LAGGERE, PEENYA POST,
BANGALORE - 560 058.
PRESENTLY R/AT NO.47/4,
1ST CROSS
1ST MAIN ROAD,
CHAMUNDESHWARI LAYOUT,
VIDYARANYAPURA POST,
BENGALURU - 560 097.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. N S BHAT, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR. VENKATA REDDY
S/O MR MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
R/ATNO.16, 6TH BLOCK,
BEL EXTENSION, DURGA TEMPLE STREET,
VIDYARANYAPURA POST,
BENGALURU – 560 097.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. R HARINATH, ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
THEJAS
KUMAR N
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.10.2021 PASSED IN
OS No.16194/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL
CITY
CIVIL
AND
SESSIONS
JUDGE,
MAYOHALL
UNIT,
BANGALORE AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ARGUMENTS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo for withdrawal of the appeal and suit along with taking signature of the appellant withdrawing the appeal by reserving liberty to file fresh comprehensive suit for declaration of title and ownership in respect of the suit property.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and also the suit i.e., O.S.No.16194/2006 is also dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved to the
HC-KAR
appellant/plaintiff to file fresh comprehensive suit for declaration of title/ownership on the same cause of action as stated in the O.S.No.16194/2006.
4. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as above stated.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE rv List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35