Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9553/2026 of AMOGH S JAGTHAPA Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 17 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010448872026 NC: 2026:KHC:44320 CRL.P No. 9553 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9553 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. AMOGH S. JAGTHAPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, S/O SAMBOJI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9553 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
AMOGH S. JAGTHAPA,
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS,
S/O SAMBOJI RAO,
2.
PUTTASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
S/O KARIYALAH,
3.
MAHADEVASWAMY M.M.,
S/O C. MADHU,
AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT MARKALU VILLAGE,
KIRUGAVALU HOBLI, MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SIDDHARTH B. MUCHANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY KIRUGAVALU POLICE STATION,
MANDYA DISTRICT,
REPRESENTED BY THE
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
NATARAJU M.,
S/O LATE MAYIGAIAH,
AGED 54 YEARS,
R/AT. MARKALU VILLAGE,
KIRUGAVALU HOBLI,
MALAVALLI TALUK,
MANDYA DISTRICT-571430.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS
AGAINST THEM IN SPL.C.NO.168/2022 BEFORE THE HONBLE V
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT, MANDYA FOR THE
ALLEGED OFFENCES P/U/S 143, 144, 147, 307, 326, 120B R/W
SEC.149 OF IPC AND SEC.3(2)(v) OF SC AND ST (POA) ACT
AND SEC.3 R/W SEC.181 OF IMV ACT.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
After arguing the matter for some time, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and avail of the remedy of filing of discharge before the appropriate forum.
2. Reserving such liberty, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
MCR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36