Karnataka High Court
RFA/1646/2026 of SMT. SUREKHA PRAKASHAN Vs LALITH V REDDY on 17 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010554302026 NC: 2026:KHC:44088 RFA No. 1646 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1646 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SUREKHA PRAKASHAN, AGED ABOUT 53
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1646 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. SUREKHA PRAKASHAN,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
W/O V KRISHNA REDDY,
R/AT NO.17,
2ND CROSS, 6TH ROAD,
NANDIDURGA ROAD EXTENSION,
BENSON TOWN,
BENGALURU - 560 046
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. VISHNU HEGDE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
LALITH V REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS,
S/O LATE V KRISHNA REDDY,
R/AT NO.118 FLAT NO.203,
2ND FLOOR,
RMZ WOODS VALE,
NANDIDURGA ROAD,
BENSON TOWN,
BENGALURU - 560 046
2.
V RAJA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 47 EYARS,
S/O LATE V KRISHNA REDDY,
Digitally
signed by
THEJAS
KUMAR N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
R/AT NO.305 3RD FLOOR,
SRI NILAYA APARTMENT,
VIDYANAGAR,
COOLONYPERURU,
TIRUPATI CHITOOR (DISTRICT),
ANDHRA PRADESH STATE - 517 502
3.
V VIKRAM REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
S/O LATE V KRISHNAR EDDY,
R/AT VALLIVEDU VILLAGE AND POST,
PAKALA (MANDAL) CHANDRAGIRI TALUK,
CHITOOR DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH - 517 152
…RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 01.04.2026
PASSED IN OS.NO.5580/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE XLII
ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR RESTORATION OF POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo requesting to convert this Regular First Appeal into a Civil Revision petition.
2. The memo is accepted.
3. The Regular First Appeal is converted as Civil Revision Petition.
4. Appeal memo is to be altered as Civil Revision Petition. Necessary alterations to be carried out.
5. The RFA is shown as disposed of for statistical purpose.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
SPV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10