Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/9819/2026 of SMT REKHA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 13 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010403902026 NC: 2026:KHC:43158 CRL.P No. 9819 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9819 OF 2026 BETWEEN: SMT. REKHA W/O SUNIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9819 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
SMT. REKHA
W/O SUNIL KUMAR
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT BUDDA CIRCLE, KOTTUR TALUK
KOTTUR TOWN, BALLARI DISTRICT - 583 134
ALSO AT R/AT C/O AJAYA PIMPLE,
(PC NO.17759) AT NO.08, "B" BLOCK,
BINNY MILL POLICE QUARTERS,
TANK BANDA ROAD,
BENGALURU - 560 023.
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. MANULA A. HALABHAVI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
ASHOK NAGAR POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU.
R/BY IT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA COMPLEX
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SUNIL KUMAR.C
S/O SRIDHAR.C
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
R/O ASTIN TOWN POLICE QUITTERS,
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
BENGALURU CITY
BENGALURU - 560 047
ALSO AT R/O NO.48
4TH MAIN,
NANJAPPA LAYOUT,
ADUGODI,
BENGALURU - 560 030.
ALSO AT BUDDA CIRCLE
KOTTOR TOWN,
BALLARI DISTRICT - 583 134.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K. NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S
528 BNSS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED COMMON
ORDER DATED 10.06.2026 I.E ANNEXURE-NO.1 PASSED BY
THE HONBLE COURT OF XXIX A.C.J.M (MAYO HALL UNIT)
BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.55066/2020 AND CONSEQUENTLY
ALLOW THE APPLICATION UNDER SEC.242(2) OF IPC FILED BY
THE PETITIONER / COMPLAINANT HEREIN AS PRAYED FOR.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
HC-KAR
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The petitioner above named prays that the petitioner has filed the above said petition for Quash the impugned common order dated 10.06.2026 i.e. Annexure – A passed by the Hon’ble Court of XXIX Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Mayohall Unit) Bengaluru in C.c.No.55066/2020 and consequently allow the application filed under section 242(2) of Cr.PC. However, during the pending of this petition, on 18.06.2026, the Hon’ble 29th ACJM, (Mayohall Unit), Bengaluru, pronounced the judgment and acquittal the accused. The petitioner intends to challenge the Judgment and Order dated 18.06.2026 passed by the 29th ACJM, Mayohall Unit, Bengaluru before the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru. Hence, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above-said petition as NOT- PRESS or WITHDRAW with liberty to file the Fresh Petition in the interest of justice and equity."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 62