Karnataka High Court
WP/24242/2026 of SRI R S RAMANNA Vs SMT LAKSHMAMMA on 13 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010533542026 NC: 2026:KHC:43333 WP No. 24242 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 24242 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI R.S.RAMANNA S/O LATE SIDDAPPA @ SIDDAIAH
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010533542026
NC: 2026:KHC:43333
WP No. 24242 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 24242 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SRI R.S.RAMANNA
S/O LATE SIDDAPPA @ SIDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS
REPRESENTED BY HIS SPECIAL
POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER
SRI. R. KRISHNAMURTHY
S/O R.S.RAMANNA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
BOTH RESIDING AT
RASTHE PALYA VILLAGE,
TALEKERE DAKALU,
BAGENEGERE POST,
THIPPASANDRA HOBLI,
MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANGARA DISTRICT – 562 159
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BALAGANGADHARA G.S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT.LAKSHMAMMA
W/O LATE NAGARAJU
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
RESIDING AT RASTHE PALYA VILLAGE,
TALEKERE DAKALU,
BAGENEGERE POST,
THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK,
RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562159.
…RESPONDENT
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010533542026
NC: 2026:KHC:43333
WP No. 24242 of 2026
THIS
WP
IS
FILED
UNDER
ARTICLE
OF
THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDERS
PASSED BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, MAGADI DATED 14.07.2026 IN RA NO.76/2025 ON IA NO.2, WHICH THE AS SAME IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E IMPUGNED, PERVERSE AND CAPRICIOUS AND LIABLE TO BE SET ASIDE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Office objection regarding the maintainability of the writ petition is upheld.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate petition within two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
i. Registry is directed to return all the documents to the petitioner, retaining the office copy.
ii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 46