Karnataka High Court

WP/14505/2026 of SRI E R PARANDAMA NAIDU Vs SMT. MAHADEVI, on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010318992026 NC: 2026:KHC:42912 WP No. 14505 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14505 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI E R PARANDAMA NAIDU S/O. EDALA

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 14505 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI E R PARANDAMA NAIDU

S/O. EDALA RAMACHANDRA NAIDU,

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.814,

5TH A CROSS, 11TH MAIN ROAD,

BANNERGHATTA ROAD,

BTM LAYOUT 2ND STAGE,

MICO LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 076.

2.

SRI. DORESWAMY M.

S/O. MARKANDEYA

AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,

RESIDING AT NO.29, 1ST MAIN ROAD,

1ST CROSS, S. RAMA RAO LAYOUT,

BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085.

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. BALARAJ A.C., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT. MAHADEVI,

D/O MUNIYAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.

2.

SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA,

S/O.LATE. MARAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

3.

SRI. GOPALA,

S/O. NARAYANAPPA

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.

4.

SRI. SANDESH

S/O. LATE LAKSHMAIAH

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.

ALL ARE RESIDING AT YARTIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2

SRI. P.D. SURANA, ADVOCATE FOR R3

SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R4)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-1) CALL FOR THE

RECORDS. II) SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE

LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., DEVANAHALLI, IN O.S.NO.6

OF 2026 DATED 08.01.2026, VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND BE

PLEASED TO GRANT RELIEFS AS PRAYED FOR IN THE

APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF EXPARTE INTERIM ORDER BY

ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF TEMPORARY

INJUNCTION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN BEFORE THE

COURT BELOW IN O.S.NO.6 OF 2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-G, BY

RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS AND THEIR HENCHMEN, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, HEIRS, ETC., FROM

INTERFERING/ OBSTRUCTING THE POSSESSION OF THE

PETITIONERS

AND

HIS

FAMILY

MEMBERS

AND

REPRESENTATIVES IN ANY MANNER OVER THE SCHEDULE

PROPERTY.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

HC-KAR

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead