Karnataka High Court
WP/14505/2026 of SRI E R PARANDAMA NAIDU Vs SMT. MAHADEVI, on 12 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010318992026 NC: 2026:KHC:42912 WP No. 14505 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 14505 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI E R PARANDAMA NAIDU S/O. EDALA
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 14505 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI E R PARANDAMA NAIDU
S/O. EDALA RAMACHANDRA NAIDU,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.814,
5TH A CROSS, 11TH MAIN ROAD,
BANNERGHATTA ROAD,
BTM LAYOUT 2ND STAGE,
MICO LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 076.
2.
SRI. DORESWAMY M.
S/O. MARKANDEYA
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.29, 1ST MAIN ROAD,
1ST CROSS, S. RAMA RAO LAYOUT,
BSK 3RD STAGE, BENGALURU - 560 085.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. BALARAJ A.C., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. MAHADEVI,
D/O MUNIYAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS.
2.
SRI. RAMACHANDRAPPA,
S/O.LATE. MARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS.
Digitally
signed by
SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
SRI. GOPALA,
S/O. NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.
4.
SRI. SANDESH
S/O. LATE LAKSHMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS.
ALL ARE RESIDING AT YARTIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2
SRI. P.D. SURANA, ADVOCATE FOR R3
SRI. B. RAMESH, ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-1) CALL FOR THE
RECORDS. II) SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE
LEARNED CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., DEVANAHALLI, IN O.S.NO.6
OF 2026 DATED 08.01.2026, VIDE ANNEXURE-H AND BE
PLEASED TO GRANT RELIEFS AS PRAYED FOR IN THE
APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF EXPARTE INTERIM ORDER BY
ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT OF TEMPORARY
INJUNCTION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN BEFORE THE
COURT BELOW IN O.S.NO.6 OF 2026 VIDE ANNEXURE-G, BY
RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS AND THEIR HENCHMEN, AGENTS, REPRESENTATIVES, HEIRS, ETC., FROM
INTERFERING/ OBSTRUCTING THE POSSESSION OF THE
PETITIONERS
AND
HIS
FAMILY
MEMBERS
AND
REPRESENTATIVES IN ANY MANNER OVER THE SCHEDULE
PROPERTY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1