Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/7460/2026 of MRS VINET VIMALA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 12 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010350302026 NC: 2026:KHC:43666 CRL.P No. 7460 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7460 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. MRS. VINET VIMALA, W/O MR. LEO SEQUIERA, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7460 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
MRS. VINET VIMALA,
W/O MR. LEO SEQUIERA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
PRINCIPAL
SREE KRISHNA INSTITUTE OF LAW,
80 FEET ROAD, MAHALAKSHINAGARA
BATAWADI, TUMAKURU - 572103.
2.
MRS. DR. HEMALATHA S,
W/O DR. CHANDRASHEKAR N.,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
PRINCIPAL
SREE KRISHNA COLLEGE OF NURSING
80 FEET ROAD, MAHALAKSHINAGARA
BATAWADI, TUMAKURU - 572103.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI V.B SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY CEN CRIME POLICE STATION,
(CYBERCRIME, ECONOMIC OFFENCES, NARCOTICS)
KUNIGAL ROAD, NEAR CALTEX CIRCLE,
TUMAKURU TOWN – 572101.
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
SRI THIPPESWAMY,
S/O LATE RAJANNA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
TALUK EXTENSION OFFICER,
MINORITY WELFARE DEPARTMENT,
TUMAKURU SUB-DIVISION – 572102,
UPPARAHALLI, TUMAKURU.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R-1 & R-2)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 (FILED U/S.528 BNSS)
CR.P.C TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.64/2025 REGISTERED
BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT - CEN CRIME POLICE STATION
(CYBER CRIME, ECONOMIC OFFENCE, NARCOTIES), TUMAKURU
FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/US/ 464,465,468,420 OF IPC, AND SEC.66(c),66(D) OF IT ACT, REGISTERED ON THE
COMPLIANT OF THE 2nd RESPONDENT, PENDING ON THE FILE
OF THE III ADDL. SENIOR AND JMFC TUMAKURU.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has moved a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition.
HC-KAR
2. The memo reads as follows: “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The Petitioner submits that, the Respondent No.1 has investigated the case, in the pendency of the above Criminal Petition and prepared Final B-Report. Hence, the Petitioners are withdrawing the above Criminal Petition, enabling the Respondent No.1 to file ‘B’ report, in the liberty to the Petitioners to approach this Hon’ble Court, in case if the adverse report (charge sheet) is filed, to meet the ends of justice.”
In terms of the memo, the criminal petition is disposed as withdrawn. I.A.No.1/2026 is also disposed as a consequence.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
NVJ List No.: 2 Sl No.: 66