Karnataka High Court

WP/4418/2026 of SRI M MADHU Vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY on 12 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010101012026 NC: 2026:KHC:42848 WP No. 4418 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 4418 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI M MADHU S/O SRI.MUNIRAJU, AGED ABOUT 46

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 4418 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

1.

SRI M MADHU

S/O SRI.MUNIRAJU,

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

R/AT NO.13/A HARSHA LAYOUT,

MUDDANNA GARDEN KENGERI,

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560 060

2.

SMT MUNITHAYAMMA

W/O SRI. MUNIRAJU,

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS

R/A NO.13/A HARSHA LAY OUT,

MUDDANNA GARDEN KENGERI,

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560 060

3.

SRI. M. NARASIMHA MURTHY

S/O SRI.MUNIRAJU,

AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS

R/A NO.13/A HARSHA LAY OUT,

MUDDANNA GARDEN KENGERI,

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560 060

4.

SRI. M. DEVARAJU

S/O SRI.MUNIRAJU,

AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS

R/AT NO.13/A HARSHA LAY OUT,

Digitally signed

by SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

MUDDANNA GARDEN KENGERI,

BANGALORE DISTRICT - 560 060

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. VASUDEVA IYENGAR K.T., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

THE CHIEF SECRETARY

REVENUE DEPARTMENT

GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,

BANGALORE - 560 001

2.

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER

THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

KUMARAPARK EAST

T. CHOWDIAH ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 020

3.

THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK EAST

T. CHOWDIAH ROAD,

BANGALORE-560 020

4.

THE COMMISSIONER,

REPRESENTING THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT

AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK EAST

T.CHOWDIAH ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 020

5.

THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS

BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK

1ST FLOOR, KANDAYA BHAVANA

HC-KAR

K.G. ROAD,

BANGALORE - 560 009

6.

SMT. BHARATHI

AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS

W/O SRI.LOKESH

7.

SRI. DHANANJAYA

AGED 38 YEARS

S/O SRI.LOKESH

8.

SRI. TEJASWI

W/O.UDAYA,

AGED 38 YEARS

9.

SMT. LAVANYA.

AGED 36 YEARS

RESPONDENTS NO.6 TO 9 ARE R/AT NO.530,

UPPER STREET, RAILWAY STATION ROAD KENGERI

BANGALORE - 560 060

10.

NARASIMHAPPA

S/O APPANNA

AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

11.

SMT. KAMALA N.

W/O.LATE HANUMANTHA

AGED 48 YEARS

R/AT NO.530, UPPER STREET,

RAILWAY STATION ROAD

KENGERI

BANGALORE-560 060

HC-KAR

12.

SMT.SAVITHRAMMA

AGED 65 YEARS

W/O.KRISHNA MURTHY

D.O.NARAYANAPPA THYAGADAHALLI VILLAGE,

MANDEGERE POST

NELAMANGALA TALUK

BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203

13.

SMT. BHAGYAMMA

AGED 62 YEARS

W/O. K NARAYANAPPA @ PEDDAIAH

D/O. NARAYANAPPA MYLASANDRA VILLAGE,

RV COLLEGE POST KENGERI

BANGALORE - 560 060

14.

SMT. JAYAMMA

AGED 58 YEARS

W/O. RAJASEKAR

D/O. NARAYANAPPA THYAGADAHALLI VILLAGE,

R/AT NO.20 17TH MAIN, SRINAGAR,

BANGALORE - 560 050

15.

SMT. MUNIRATHNAMMA

AGED 59 YEARS

D/O. PAPAMMA

16.

SRI. RENUKA PRASAD,

AGED 38 YEARS

S/O. LATE PAPAMMA

17.

SRI.MANJUNATHA

AGED 35 YEARS

S/O. LATE PAPAMMA

HC-KAR

RESPONDENTS NO.16 AND 17 ARE R/AT

MARENAHALLI VILLAGE,

BAGALURU POST JALA HOBLI,

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK - 562 149

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. SANJAY YADAV B., AGA FOR R1 AND R5)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS ON FILE OF 1ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL

AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT BANGALORE IN FDP NO.149/2021

PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-L AS ILLEGAL IN THE INTEREST OF

JUSTICE.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The present writ petition is filed seeking the following prayers: “1.

Issue

a writ/ order/ direction of appropriate nature to by passing such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court deems fit in the facts and circumstances of the case, including the cost of this proceedings, in the Interest of justice and equity.

HC-KAR

2. Issue direction to the concerned to hold otherwise and detrimental to this Orders of this Hon'ble court in WP NO.33821.2024(LA- BDA) dated 13.12.2024 (Annexure-K) that the said Hon'ble Court, on file 1st additional City Civil And Sessions Judge at Bangalore had no power to entertain suit OS no.9653/1998 and FDP NO.149/2021, the orders of court commissioner, There on by the land surveyor, Bangalore south taluk Bangalore dated 10.11.2025, (ANNEXURE-K) in the interest of justice.”

2. It is the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners that the Court has no jurisdiction to deal with the matter and, hence, he has come before the Court to set aside the entire proceedings on the file of the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, passed in FDP No. 149/2021. This Court is of the view that such a writ petition cannot be entertained by this Court. If, according to the petitioners, the FDP proceedings are not maintainable, they have the appropriate remedy before the very same Court by filing an appropriate application and bringing it to the notice of the Court that such proceedings were not maintainable.

HC-KAR

3. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, giving liberty to the petitioners to avail the appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead