Karnataka High Court
RFA/2174/2023 of SRI. A S ANWAR SHARIEFF Vs SRI. RAFIULLA on 12 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010585902023 NC: 2026:KHC:42798 RFA No. 2174 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2174 OF 2023 (SP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A . S. ANWAR SHARIEFF, AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2174 OF 2023 (SP)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. A. S. ANWAR SHARIEFF,
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,
SON OF LATE ABDUL SATTAR,
2.
SRI. SALMAN SHARIEFF,
SON OF A. S. ANWAR SHARIEFF,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
BOTH THE APPELLANTS ARE
RESIDING AT NO.80,
BENSON TOWN CROSS ROAD,
BENSON TOWN, BENGALURU – 560 046.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. RAJESH A., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SRI. RAFIULLA,
SON OF LATE SRI SAMIULLA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT NO 2, SAMIULLA BUILDING,
1ST CROSS, HANIFIA MOSQUE ROAD,
KUSHAL NAGAR, K. G. HALLI,
BENGALURU – 560 045.
2.
SRI. C. A. MALLIK,
SON OF ABDUL SAMMAD,
AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS,
3.
SRI. K. S. KAREEM,
Digitally
signed by
THEJAS
KUMAR N
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
SON OF JANAB K. MOHAMMAD
GHOUSE SAHIB,
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT NO.16,
VEPERY HIGH ROAD, PERIAMPET,
CHENNAI – 600 003.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 READ WITH ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 02.01.2020 PASSED IN OS
NO.5926/2016 ON THE FILE OF XX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants has filed a memo stating that the subject matter in the appeal is settled out of Court and the said compromise is reported by the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court has observed that since the matter is settled between the parties, the appeal does not survive for consideration.
HC-KAR
2. The said memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the said memo, the appeal is disposed of, the matter having been settled between the parties.
4. The Court fee paid by the appellants shall be refunded to the appellants with proper identification.
Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE
SRA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6