Karnataka High Court
CRP/451/2026 of SRI K G YOGANANDA Vs G VEERANNA on 12 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010321502026 NC: 2026:KHC:42924 CRP No. 451 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 451 OF 2026 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI K.G.YOGANANDA S/O LATE KANCHIKERE
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 451 OF 2026 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI K.G.YOGANANDA
S/O LATE KANCHIKERE GURUSIDDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
OCCAGRICULTURE,
R/O CHIKKABANNIHATTI VILLAGE,
JAGALUR TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT- 577 001
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G.J.SUNKAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
G VEERANNA
S/O LATE JATHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
OCC:AGRICULTURE,
R/O HORAKERE,
JAGALUR TOWN AND TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DIST-577 001
2.
SMT. VANAJAKSHI
W/O K.G. YOGANANDA
OCC HOUSEWIFE,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/O CHIKKABANNIHATTI VILLAGE,
JAGALUR TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DISTRICT- 577 001
3.
H.S. KARIBASAPPA
S/O VEERAPPA
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,
OCC AGRICULTURE,
R/O HOSAKERE VILLAGE,
JAGALUR TALUK,
DAVANAGERE DIST-577 001
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC, PRAYING TO
SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19.02.2026
(ANNEXURE - A) AND TO ALLOW CIVIL MISC NO.17/2022, ON
THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ITINERARY COURT AT
JAGALUR.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed stating that the office has raised objection in view of Section 115 of CPC and the present petition is not maintainable before this Court. Hence, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition with a liberty to file an appropriate petition.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to file an appropriate petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
HC-KAR
i. Registry is directed to return all the documents to the petitioner, retaining the office copy.
ii. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 88