Karnataka High Court

WP/11526/2026 of SRI PUTTASWAMY Vs SMT DEEVIRAMMA on 11 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010250952026 NC: 2026:KHC:42470 WP No. 11526 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 11526 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SRI. PUTTASWAMY, S/O LATE NINGEGOWDA, AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 11526 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SRI. PUTTASWAMY,

S/O LATE NINGEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. JAYARAJA A.T., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SMT. DEEVIRAMMA,

W/O MARIGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,

R/AT KOORANAGERE VILLAGE,

MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

2.

SMT. CHIKKATAYAMMA,

W/O LATE SHANKAREGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,

R/AT MUDUGERE VILLAGE,

MALURU HOBLI,

CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

Digitally signed

by SUVARNA T

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

3.

SMT.GOWRAMMA,

W/O VENKATAPPA,

AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,

R/AT TOREHOSURU VILLAGE,

MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

4.

MACHEGOWDA

DIED ON 07-11-2019

HENCE HIS LEGAL HEIRS

SMT. ANUSUYAMMA,

W/O LATE MACHEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,

5.

SRI.G.M YATHISHA,

S/O LATE MANCHEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,

SL.NO.4(a) AND 4(b)

CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

6.

SMT.RAMYA,

W/O VENKATESH,

D/O LATE MANCHEGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,

R/AT JAGADAPURA VILLAGE,

VIRUPAKSHIPUARA HOBLI,

CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

HC-KAR

7.

STATE BANK OF MYSORE,

MUDUGERE BRANCH,

CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA - 562 159,

REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER.

8.

SRI.K.M VENKATESH,

S/O. LATE MARIGOWDA,

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,

CHANNAPATTANA TALUK,

RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159.

…RESPONDENTS

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF

THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE

IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 07.02.2024 PASSED BY THE SENIOR

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT CHANNAPATTANA IN FDP 1/2021

VIDE ANNEXURE - D AND ETC.,

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

HC-KAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the present writ petition has become infructuous. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

2. The memo is taken on record.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

4. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead