Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/14879/2025 of T.S. DEEPAK Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 11 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010701832025 NC: 2026:KHC:42727 CRL.P No. 14879 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14879 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. T.S.DEEPAK, S/O S.V.SHIVAPRASAD, AGED ABOUT 41
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 14879 OF 2025
BETWEEN:
1.
T.S.DEEPAK,
S/O S.V.SHIVAPRASAD,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
2.
SHIVAPRASAD,
S/O LATE VEERANNAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
3.
SMT. KRUPADEVI,
W/O SHIVAPRASAD,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
4.
SHEWATH T.S.,
D/O SHIVAPRASAD,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 4 ARE
R/OF "SHIVAKRUPA NILAYA",
NEAR SRV COLLEGE,
SHANKARAPPA LAYOUT,
TIPTUR - 572 201,
TUMKUR DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. A.N. RADHA KRISHNA., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY TIPTUR TOWN POLICE,
TIPTUR,
REPRESENTED BY THE
STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
SMT. RANJANI H.P. @ REKHA,
W/O DEEPAK T S,
AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS,
R/AT LAKSHMI NIVASA,
BEHIND BIG MARKET,
MANJULAMMA GARDEN,
HASSAN CIRCLE,
HASSAN CIRCLE,
TIPTUR TOWN - 572 201.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL, HCGP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P. IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS)
PRAYING
TO
QUASH
THE
FIR/COMPLAINT
IN
CR.NO.175/2025 OF TIPTUR TOWN POLICE, FOR OFFENCES
P/U/S. 115(2), 118(1) OF BNS, 2023 AND 3 AND 4 OF D.P ACT, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LD. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, TIPTUR.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
HC-KAR
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows: "MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
" The petitioner seeks leave of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the petition, since the Police have filed charge sheet. The petitioners may be permitted to file Fresh Petition challenging the charge sheet."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
HR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 85