Karnataka High Court
WP/21631/2026 of SRI. MANOHAR.B.M. Vs SMT. RANJITHA .N. on 11 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010480072026 NC: 2026:KHC:42564 WP No. 21631 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 21631 OF 2026 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MANOHAR.B.M., S/O MOKSHENDRA RAJU K.S.,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 21631 OF 2026 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. MANOHAR.B.M.,
S/O MOKSHENDRA RAJU K.S.,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
2.
SRI. MOKSHENDRA RAJU K.S.,
S/O LATE K.T. SHYAMACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS,
3.
SMT. RAMAMANI,
W/O MOKSHENDRA RAJU K.S.,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
4.
KUM. NAMRATHA B.M.,
D/O MOKSHENDRA RAJU K.S.,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,
ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE
RESIDING AT NO.110,
NAMMA KANASINA MANE,
4TH CROSS, 60 FT. ROAD,
KGS HBCS LAYOUT,
PAPAREDDYPALYA, NAGARABHAVI,
BENGALURU - 560 072.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. KASHINATH J.D., ADVOCATE)
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
AND:
SMT. RANJITHA .N.,
W/O MANOHAR.B.M.,
AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,
D/O P.K. NAGARAJA,
RESIDING AT NO.178,
1ST FLOOR, 5TH CROSS,
NEAR MADEGOWDA CIRCLE,
HEBBALA 2ND STAGE,
MYSORE - 570 024.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RUPESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) CALL FOR THE
RECORDS CONNECTED TO WITH THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
DATED 02.12.2024 PASSED IN CRL. APPEAL NO.176/2026 ON
THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT
MYSORE AND ETC.,
THIS
PETITION,
COMING
ON
FOR
PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Heard Sri. Kashinath J.D., learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, Sri. Rupesh Kumar S., learned counsel
HC-KAR
appearing for the respondent and have perused the material on record.
2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the order passed on 27.07.2026, the petitioners have deposited 26 months arrears, 50% of which will now be permitted to withdrawn by the wife.
3. Registry is directed to transmit the said amount to the account of the wife without brooking any delay.
4. Both the learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that the matter be disposed with a direction to the appellate Court to dispose the subject appeal within a time frame.
5. In the light of the said submission, I deem it appropriate to direct the concerned Court to dispose the appeal within an outer limit of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.
HC-KAR
6. The remainder of the 50% of the amount be transmitted to the Appellate Court for the Appellate Court to pass necessary orders for its release.
7. It is made clear that the maintenance that is awarded shall be continued to be paid to the wife unless the concerned Court would modify the same.
With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
SJK List No.: 2 Sl No.: 54