Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/10304/2026 of CHANDRAKANTH RAJE URS Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010476222026 NC: 2026:KHC:42288 CRL.P No. 10304 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10304 OF 2026 BETWEEN: CHANDRAKANTH RAJE URS S/O VASANTHA RAJE URS T, AGED
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 10304 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
CHANDRAKANTH RAJE URS
S/O VASANTHA RAJE URS T,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,
PERMANENT R/AT NO. 70/1,
NEAR GOVERNMENT SCHOOL,
ASWAL HITNEBBAGILU,
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SUNIL S. NARAYAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY BETTADAPURA PS,
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107
REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX, BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
NAVEEN RAJ URS
S/O LATE SHANKAR RAJE URS,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
R/AT NAGANAHALLI VILLAGE,
PERIYAPATNA TALUK,
MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 107.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. WAHEEDA M.M, HCGP FOR R1)
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNNS) PRAYING TO 1. ALLOW THE CRL.P 2.TO QUASH THE
PROCEEDINGS REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER I.E
ACCUSED HEREIN IN C.C.NO.732/2025 I.E CR.NO.49/2025
PENDING BEFORE THE 1ST ADDL.CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT
PERIYAPATNA FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 118(2), 352, 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2) OF BNS REGISTERED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT POLICE I.E BETTADAPURA P.S. MYSURU DIST.
I.E ANNEXURE-D.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before the Court calling in question the proceedings in C.C.No.732/2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 118(2), 352, 126(2), 118(1), 115(2), 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023.
2. The learned High Court Government Pleader on instructions and verification of the records would submit that the charges have already been framed and is accepted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.
HC-KAR
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though charges have been framed, the dispute is essentially between the brothers of the family, the concerned Court be directed to conclude the proceedings expeditiously.
4. In the light of the issue is of the year 2025, I deem it appropriate to infuse finality into the proceedings with a direction to the concerned Court to dispose the proceedings, within an outer limit of nine months from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, if not earlier.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed.
Ordered accordingly.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 98