Karnataka High Court
CRL.P/7605/2026 of MANJULA Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 10 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010365802026 NC: 2026:KHC:42624 CRL.P No. 7605 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7605 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. MANJULA, W/O. M.H. HANUMANTHAPPA, AGED ABOUT 27
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 7605 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
MANJULA,
W/O. M.H. HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/AT NISHANTH NILAYA,
NEAR HALAPPA COMPLEX,
NARASIMHA EXTN, 2ND STAGE, 1ST CROSS,
VINOBHA NAGAR, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 204.
2.
RAMAKRISHNA M.H,
S/O. M.H. HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS,
R/AT NISHANTH NILAYA,
2ND CROSS, HALAPPA COMPLEX,
OPP. NARASIMHA BADAVANE,
VINOBHA NAGAR,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 204.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. B. LETHIF, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,
REP. BY VINOBHA NAGARA POLICE STATION,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT,
REP. BY SPP, HIGH COURT BUILDING,
Digitally
signed by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location:
High Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
BANGALORE - 560001.
2.
SHARATH NAIK K.R,
S/O. K.R RENYA NAIKA,
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
R/AT KOTE GANJURU POST,
SHIVAMOGGA TALUK,
SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT - 577 204.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. DEEPTHI ALVA, HCGP FOR R-1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528
BNSS) TO QUASH THE FIR IN CRIME NO.30/2026 FOR THE
OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 352, 115(2), 351(2), 3(5) OF BNS AND SECTIONS 3(1) (r), 3(1) (s), 3(2) (va) OF SC
AND ST (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) AMENDMENT ACT 2015
OF
VINOBHA
NAGAR
POLICE,
SHIVAMOGGA
DISTRICT;
PENDING ON THE FILE OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA WHICH IS PRODUCED AT
ANNEXURE-A.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
HC-KAR
“MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
Undersigned Counsel for the Petitioner hereby submits that the petition may be withdrawn with a liberty to challenge the charge sheet, since the charge sheet has been filed in the above case during the pendency of the petition, same may be taken on record in the interest of justice.”
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
CBC List No.: 5 Sl No.: 1