Karnataka High Court
MFA/7861/2023 of SANTHOSH KUMAR Vs THE MANAGER on 10 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010609312023 NC: 2026:KHC:42126 MFA No. 7861 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7861 OF 2023(MV-I) BETWEEN: SANTHOSH KUMAR, S/O.SUBRAMANIAN, NOW AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010609312023
NC: 2026:KHC:42126
MFA No. 7861 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.7861 OF 2023(MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SANTHOSH KUMAR,
S/O.SUBRAMANIAN,
NOW AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/AT NO 851, 4TH CROSS,
SWARNA NAGAR,
ROBERTSONPET, K.G.F.
…APPELLANT
(BY SRI. RAGHU R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE MANAGER,
M/C UNITED INDIA
INSURANCE CO LTD.,
NO 206-207, 1ST FLOOR,
SAPTHAGIRI TOWERS,
BEGUMPET, HYDERBAD – 16.
2.
SHAIK AZAM,
S/O G KHADAR SAB,
MAJOR, R/AT NO 4-134,
BAPUJI VEEDHI, V KOTA,
CHITTOOR DISTRICT – 517 408.
SINCE DEAD,
[NOTE: IN PARA NO.6 OF THE JUDGMENT
MENTIONED THAT AFTER REMAND THE R2
REPORTED TO DEAD AND HE HAS NO LEGA HEIRS]
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SURESH K., ADVOCATE,
VIDE ORDER DATED 22.04.2026 APPEAL
AGAINST R2 IS DISMISSED AS ABATED)
Digitally signed by
REKHA R
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010609312023
NC: 2026:KHC:42126
MFA No. 7861 of 2023
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:15.02.2023
PASSED IN MVC NO.19/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE AND PRINCIPAL JMFC, K.G.F., MEMBER, MACT, K.G.F., PARTLY
ALLOWING
THE
CLAIM
PETITION
FOR
COMPENSATION
AND
SEEKING
ENHANCEMENT
OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
PK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39