Karnataka High Court
CRP/344/2026 of SMT MAHADEVI @ MAHADEVAMMA Vs SMT GOWRAMMA on 10 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010236662026 NC: 2026:KHC:42466 CRP No. 344 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 344 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. MAHADEVI @ MAHADEVAMMA, W/O NANJAPPA,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 344 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. MAHADEVI @ MAHADEVAMMA,
W/O NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
R/AT DEVALAPURA VILLAGE,
VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK,
MYSURU - 571 311.
2.
SMT. GOWRAMMA,
W/O SHIVANNA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/AT DEVALAPURA VILLAGE,
VARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK,
MYSURU - 571 311.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAVISHANKAR S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. GOWRAMMA,
W/O SHIVAPPA,
AGED IN MAJOR,
R/AT DHANANAYAKANAPURA,
T. NARASIPURA TALUK,
MYSURU - 571 124.
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
2.
SMT. RATHNAMMA,
W/O LINGANNA @ NINGANNA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
R/AT LALITHADRIPURA VILLAGE,
VARUNA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK,
MYSURU - 570 028.
3.
SMT.SAKAMMA,
W/O RAJU,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
HEBYA VILLAGE,
CHIKKAIAHNACHATRA HOBLI,
NANJANAGUD TALUK,
MYSURU - 571 302.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING
TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.01.2026 PASSED BY THE
PRL. SMALL CAUSES AND SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT AT
MYSURU, IN CIVIL.MISC. PETITION NO.10 OF 2020 AND
RESTORE THE FDP NO.15 OF 2008 BY ALLOWING THIS CIVIL
REVISION PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND
EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
HC-KAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners seeking permission to withdraw the Civil Revision Petition with liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with a liberty to file an appropriate petition within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
4. The Registry is directed to return all the documents to the petitioners, after retaining photocopies of the same.
5. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2