Karnataka High Court
WP/15442/2025 of SRI N RAVI KUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 7 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010341632025 NC: 2026:KHC:41851 WP No. 15442 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 15442 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. N. RAVI KUMAR S/O K. NEELAPPA AGED 58 YEARS,
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 15442 OF 2025 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. N. RAVI KUMAR
S/O K. NEELAPPA
AGED 58 YEARS,
HOUSE NO. 04, VEEBHA APARTMENT,
1ST CROSS, KUMARA PARK WEST,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
(MEMBER OF LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VINOD KUMAR M, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY STATION BAZAR POLICE STATION,
GULBARGA - 585 101
REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
SRI. DATTATREYA
S/O SHANTHAPPA, AGED 55 YEARS
RESIDING AT NISARGA COLONY
KALBURGI CITY, KARNATAKA - 585 102.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ANOOP KUMAR, ADDL. SPP FOR R1;
R2 - SERVED)
Digitally signed
by
PADMAVATHI
B K
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SEC. 528 OF THE BNSS, 2023 PRAYING TO A) QUASHING THE FIR DATED 26/05/2025, IN CRIME NO-91/2025 OF STATION BAZAR POLICE STATION, GULBARGA, PRODUCED
BEFORE
THE
IIND
ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE GULBARGA FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 197, 224, 299, 302, 351, 353 OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA (BNS) 2023 AND
SECTION
3(1)(R)
OF
SC
AND
ST
(PREVENTION
OF
ATTROCITIES )ACT, 1989 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AS FAR
AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED, HOLDING THAT IT IS AN
ABUSE OF PROCESS OF LAW AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS
UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. The memo so filed reads as follows:
HC-KAR
"MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL
The petitioner most respectfully submit as under:
It is submitted that during the pendency of this case, the case have been infructuous. In view of the said settlement, the petitioner does not wish to prosecute the above case any further.
Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take the instant memo on record and permit the petitioner to withdraw the above appeal in the interest of justice and equity."
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
JY List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45