Karnataka High Court
WP/24219/2026 of SRI PRASANNA KUMAR Vs STATE OF KARNATAKA on 7 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010537102026 NC: 2026:KHC:41838-DB WP No. 24219 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO. 24219 OF 2026 (S-KSAT) BETWEEN: SRI
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
AND
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO. 24219 OF 2026 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
SRI PRASANNA KUMAR
S/O CHIKKAMALLAPPA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,
WORKING AS GEOLOGIST
OFFICE OF SENIOR GEOLOGIST
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
III FLOOR, D C OFFICE COMPLEX
CHAMARAJANAGAR-571313
R/AT NO.38, MOOKAHALLI VILLAGE,
HONGALLI POST, GUNDLUPETE TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT-571111
(UNDER ORDER OF TRANSFER).
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. YOGESH V KOTEMATH, ADV. FOR
SRI VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADV.)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
AND INDUSTRIES
VIKASA SOUDHA
BANGALORE-560001.
2.
THE DIRECTOR
DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY
NO.49, KHANIJA BHAWAN
RACE COURSE ROAD
BANGALORE-560001.
Digitally signed by
NANJUNDACHARI
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
HC-KAR
3.
THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST
DEPARTMENT OF MINES
AND GEOLOGY
NO.316 AND 317
3RD FLOOR, DC OFFICE COMPLEX,
CHAMRAJANAGAR-571313.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V SHIVA REDDY, AGA)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR
DIRECTION IN THE SIMILAR NATURE QUASHING THE INTERIM
ORDER DATED 27.07.2026 PASSED IN APPLICATION NO.3330/2026
BY
THE
KARNATAKA
STATE
ADMINISTRATIVE
TRIBUNAL,
BANGALORE VIDE ANNEXURE-A BY STAYING THE OPERATION AND
IMPLEMENTATION
OF
TRANSFER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 20.07.2026 BEARING NO. GABHUE/SIBBANDI/AA1/VARGAVANE/2026 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AUTHORITY VIDE ANNEXURE-A4 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO POSTING THE PETITIONER AT SI. NO.62 IS CONCERNED AND TO CONTINUE THE SERVICES OF THE PETITIONER AS GEOLOGIST, OFFICE OF THE SENIOR GEOLOGIST, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY, CHAMARAJANAGAR AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT)
The petitioner working as Geologist in the Mines and Geology Department is before this Court against the interim order dated 27.07.2026 in Application No.3330/2026 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal at Bengaluru (for short, ‘the Tribunal’), rejecting the petitioner’s prayer to stay the transfer office order dated 20.07.2026 (Annexure-A4).
2. Heard learned counsel Sri.Yogesh V. Kotemath for Sri.Virupakshaiah.P.H., learned counsel for petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate Sri.V.Shivareddy for respondents. Perused the entire writ petition papers.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner has completed his tenure at Chamarajanagar where he is presently working approached the Tribunal questioning the transfer office
HC-KAR
order dated 20.07.2026, wherein the petitioner was transferred to Vijayapura only on one ground that the petitioner is an elected as office-bearer of the Karnataka State Government Employees Association, Chamarajanagar District Branch. Learned counsel would submit that the Tribunal failed to take note of the same while considering the interim prayer of the petitioner. Learned counsel would further submit that no one is posted to the place of the petitioner and the post to which, the petitioner is posted is also vacant post. Therefore, the Tribunal taking note of the same ought to have granted interim order.
4. Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate Sri.V.Shivareddy would submit that the contention of the petitioner is to be considered by the Tribunal at the time of disposal of the Application and at the stage of considering interim prayer, the Tribunal rightly held that any nomination is made as an office
HC-KAR
bearer by the President of the District Unit or Taluk Unit requires the prior approval of the State President, which fact is to be verified on appearance of the respondents.
5. The contention raised by the petitioner with regard to, he being office-bearer of the Karnataka State Government Employees Association is to be considered by the Tribunal at the time of final disposal. We do not find any error at this stage to interfere with the impugned order passed by the Tribunal. Accordingly, writ petition stands rejected.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE
NC CT:bms List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21