Karnataka High Court
CRL.RP/874/2026 of SMT. VANITHA. A, Vs SMT.MAHALAKSHMI.M.P, on 7 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010358102026 NC: 2026:KHC:41735 CRL.RP No. 874 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.874 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VANITHA A ., W/O ANANDAKUMAR M., AGED ABOUT
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.874 OF 2026
BETWEEN:
1.
SMT. VANITHA A.,
W/O ANANDAKUMAR M.,
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS,
NO.5/2, BANASANKARI NILAYA,
MARATIKYATHANAHALLI, BOGADI,
MYSURU DISTRICT-570026.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VEERABHADRA SWAMY H.P., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
SMT. MAHALAKSHMI M.P,
W/O PRASHANTH M.S,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT NO.15, SHREE NILAYA,
2ND MAIN, 4TH CROSS,
NIVEDITHANAGARA,
MYSURU-560022.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. U. VINAY RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401
(FILED U/S.438 R/W SEC.442 BNSS) OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
ALLOW THE CRIMINAL RP AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER DATED 09.03.2026 MADE IN CRIMINAL APPEAL
NO.303/2025 ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE 1ST ADDL.
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT MYSURU, AND JUDGMENT
Digitally signed
by DEVIKA M
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
AND ORDER DATED 05.08.2025 MADE IN C.C.NO.500/2024 ON
THE FILE OF THE HONBLE V JMFC AT MYSURU AND
CONSIDERED THE SAID CRL.RP ON MERITS.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
This Court vide order dated 10.06.2026, suspended the sentence subject to the petitioner depositing 50% of the fine amount inclusive of the amount already deposited before the Trial Court within four weeks. It was also made clear that if the petitioner fails to deposit the fine amount within four weeks, the conditional order granted by this Court would automatically stand vacated. On 10.07.2026, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner made the submission that the matter may be referred to the Special Drive for NI Act. The petitioner did not pursue the matter before the Lok Adalath and hence, the matter was referred back to the Court. On 29.07.2026, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner made the submission that he is going to settle the matter.
2. Today, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that the petitioner is not pursuing the
HC-KAR
matter and even not complied with the order passed by this Court. When such being the case, I do not find any ground to entertain this revision petition. This revision petition is also not yet admitted and hence, in view of non-compliance of the order of this Court and also non-pursuing of the matter by the revision petitioner, the revision petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16