Karnataka High Court
CRP/862/2025 of SRI JAYARAMA REDDY Vs SMT NARAYANAMMA on 6 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010752802025 NC: 2026:KHC:41720 CRP No. 862 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 862 OF 2025 (IO) BETWEEN: SRI. JAYARAMA REDDY, S/O. SRI. LATE.
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 862 OF 2025 (IO)
BETWEEN:
SRI. JAYARAMA REDDY,
S/O. SRI. LATE. CHINNAPPA,
AGED 89 YEARS,
RESIDING BEHIND GOVERNMENT
SCHOOL, SINGASANDRA VILLAGE,
BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH
TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 098
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KAMALADHAR G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
1(A)
SMT. NARAYANAMMA
W/O. VEERAPPA,
SINCE DIED REPRESENTED BY HER LR’S.,
AMBUJA,
D/O. LATE. NARAYANAMMA,
AGED 58 YEARS,
1(B)
T. SREEDHARA REDDY,
S/O. LATE. NARAYANAMMA,
AGED 53 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location: HIGH
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
1(C)
SUJATHA .T,
D/O. LATE. NARAYANAMMA,
AGED 52 YEARS,
RESPONDENT 1(A) TO 1(C) ARE RESIDING AT
JANTAGONDANAHALLI,
SARJAPURA HOBLI,
ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 087.
2.
SMT. JAYAMMA,
D/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED 68 YEARS,
RESIDING AT JANTAGONDANAHALLI,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU - 560 087.
3.
SRI. VEERAPPA,
S/O. LATE. GURAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 98 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KODATHI VILLAGE,
VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TALUK – 560 037.
4.
SMT. SARASAMMA,
D/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
RESIDING AT #1183,
NEAR GOVT. SCHOOL,
GOVINDASHETTYPALYA,
ELECTRONIC CITY POST,
BENGALURU – 560 100.
HC-KAR
5.
SMT. GOWRAMMA,
D/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS,
RESIDING AT #9 AND 10,
4TH 'A' CROSS, KAGGADASAPURA,
BANGALORE – 560 093.
6.
SRI. NARAYANA REDDY,
S/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
RESIDING AT KODATHI VILLAGE,
VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE
EAST TALUK – 560 031
7.
SMT. BHAGYAMMA,
D/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
RESIDING AT #203, KRISHNA
LAYOUT, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI,
BENGALURU – 560 076.
8.
SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY,
S/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
RESIDING AT #22, 19TH 'G' CROSS,
BEHIND ANJANEYA TEMPLE,
KAGGADASAPURA, BENGALURU-560093.
9.
SMT. LAKSHMAMMA,
D/O. VEERAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
10.
SRI. GURUVA REDDY,
S/O. VEERAPPA,
HC-KAR
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
BOTH 9TH AND 10TH RESPONDENT ARE
RESIDING AT KODATHI VILLAGE, VARTHUR
HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST TALUK – 560 031
11.
SRI. RAJASHEKAR REDDY,
S/O. DR. GOPALAKRISHNA,
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
12.
SRI. GOPALA KRISHNA,
S/O. LATE. RANGAIAH,
AGED 82 YEARS,
BOTH 11TH AND 12TH RESPONDENTS
ARE RESIDING AT #107, 3RD CROSS,
LALBAGH ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 027
13.
M/S. J.R. INFRA ENGINEERING PVT LTD
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR
SRI. NIRANJAN KUMAR REDDY,
S/O. S. JAGADEESHWARA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
OFFICE AT NO.71, 2ND FLOOR,
2ND CROSS, R.J. GARDENS,
OUTER RING ROAD, MARATHAHALLI,
BENGALURU – 560 037
14.
SMT. A. DRAKSHAYINI,
W/O. GOVINDA,
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,
RESIDING AT “DEEPA NURSERY
GARDENS” 5TH CROSS END, 1ST BLOCK,
JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 011
HC-KAR
15.
SRI. J. SATISH BABU,
S/O. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
16.
SRI. J. VEERENDRA PRABHU,
S/O. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
17.
SRI. J. GANGADHARESH,
S/O. SRI. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
18.
SRI. J. ANAND KUMAR,
S/O. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
19.
SMT. J. NAVYA,
D/O. C. JAYARAMAREDDY,
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO.15 TO 19 ARE
RESIDING AT #3/3, NEAR BEHIND
GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, SINGASANDRA
VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE
SOUTH, BANGALORE – 560 068.
20.
SMT. J. ARUNA,
D/O. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS,
RESIDING AT #915, BEML LAYOUT,
5TH STAGE, RAJAJINAGAR, 4TH CROSS,
BENGALORE – 560 098
HC-KAR
21.
SRI. J. RAVI,
S/O. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
22.
SMT. MANJAMMA,
W/O. J. RAVI,
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
RESPONDENT NO. 21 AND 22 ARE
RESIDING AT #3/3, NEAR BEHIND
GOVERNMENT SCHOOL, SINGASINDRA
VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE
SOUTH, BANGALORE – 560 068.
23.
SMT. K. SHASHIKALA,
D/O. C. JAYARAMA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
RESIDING AT #814, 5TH MAIN,
CHENNAKESHAVANAGAR, HOSA ROAD,
HOSUR MAIN ROAD, ELECTRONIC CITY
POST, BENGALURU - 560 100
24.
SUSHEELAMMA,
W/O. LATE. NANJUNDA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS,
RESIDING AT THIGALA CHOWDDENAHALLI,
SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK,
BENGALURU – 571 223.
25.
SRI. H. SRINIVASA REDDY,
S/O. LATE. H.V. HANUMANTHA REDDY,
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HALANAYAKANAHALLI,
VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST
HC-KAR
TALUK – 560 037
26.
SRI. N. KALAPPA,
S/O. LATE. NANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS,
RESIDING AT BATTARAMARENAHALLI
VILLAGE, CHANNARAYAPATNA HOBLI,
DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL
DISTRICT – 562 135
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R. LOKESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1(A TO C) AND R2
NOTICE TO R3 TO R26 ARE DISPENSED WITH
V/O DATED 19/06/2026)
THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST
THE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
DATED 16.10.2025 PASSED IN OS.NO.812/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE IV ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE I.A.FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(A), (B) AND (D) OF CPC, FOR REJECTION OF PLAINT.
THIS CRP, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
HC-KAR
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court, aggrieved by the order dated 16.10.2025 passed in I.A. under Order VII Rule 11(a), (b) and (d) of the CPC in O.S. No. 812/2015, by the IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru, which was dismissed by the impugned order.
2. According to the defendants, he purchased the property in the year 1992. A partition among the male members of the family took place in the year 1989; based on that, the property was sold to the petitioner. In the year 2015, the suit was filed. It is submitted that the Order VII Rule 11 application was filed in the year 2017. It was disposed of on 16.10.2025. It is submitted that when the properties are already partitioned and, pursuant to that, sold, there is no cause of action against them, and the suit itself has to be dismissed on the ground of no cause of action and limitation. The trial Court, without appreciating all the facts, dismissed the application. It is submitted that, looking at the age of the defendant, who is aged 90 years, if the proceedings continue in
HC-KAR
this manner, he will not be able to see the litigation reach a logical end.
3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the trial Court has rightly dismissed the application because the defendant is concerned only with the property he has purchased; there are other suit properties; he cannot seek dismissal of the entire suit and the trial Court has rightly dismissed the application and there are no grounds to interfere.
4. Having heard the learned counsel on either side, perused the material on record. As far as the reasoning given by the trial Court is concerned, this Court is of the view that no interference is called for. However, considering the age of defendant No.13, this Court deems it appropriate to pass the following
ORDER
i. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of, directing the IV Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural District,
HC-KAR
Bengaluru, to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible, but not later than a year.
ii. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
PKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56