Karnataka High Court
WP/23025/2026 of M/S. ATTILL Vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA on 6 August 2026
CNR: KAHC010507852026 NC: 2026:KHC:41942 WP No. 23025 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 23025 OF 2026 (EXCISE) BETWEEN: M/S. ATTILL A PARTNERSHIP FIRM, UDUPI. 2ND
HC-KAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 23025 OF 2026 (EXCISE)
BETWEEN:
M/S. ATTILL
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM,
UDUPI. 2ND CROSS,
DAFFODILS, LAXMINDRANAGAR,
KUNJIBETTU POST - 576 102,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
MR. GHANASHYAM S. MALPE,
S/O. LATE SHRIDHAR MALPE,
UDUPI DISTRICT,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. M.S. RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND EXCISE,
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001
2.
COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE IN KARNATAKA
TTMC, 2ND FLOOR, BMTC COMPLEX,
SHANTHINAGAR,
BENGALURU - 560 027
Digitally signed
by SUVARNA T
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
HC-KAR
3.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE
EXCISE BHAVANA
UDUPI - 576 101
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MANJUNATH B., AGA FOR C/R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENTS
TO
CONSIDER
AND
DISPOSE
OF
THE
PETITIONERS APPLICATION DATED 13.05.2024 RECEIVED BY
THE 2ND RESPONDENT ON 17.05.2024 FOR RENEWAL OF CL-9
LICENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE KARNATAKA EXCISE ACT, 1965, THE KARNATAKA EXCISE (SALE OF INDIAN AND
FOREIGN LIQUORS) RULES, 1968 AND OTHER APPLICABLE
RULES, BY PASSING A REASONED AND SPEAKING ORDER
WITHIN A TIME TO BE FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT, A COPY
OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE - G AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.
HC-KAR
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition was filed seeking a direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation. It is further submitted that the representation has now been considered and rejected. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition.
3. The memo is taken on record.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy in accordance with law to question the order of rejection.
5. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6