CRP/679/2026 of M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD Vs SRI N G SHARATH KUMAR on 6 August 2026

1. SRI MADHUSUDHAN BALAKRISHNA S/O SRI. BALAKRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, MANDARA, 1ST MAIN, TELECOM HBCS LAYOUT, SUBRAMANYA PURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 008 REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MR.N.G.SHARATH KUMAR, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA UDUPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, MANDARA, 1ST MAIN, TELECOM HBCS LAYOUT, SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 061

2. K.P.NARASIMHA MURTHY, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 54 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

3. PRAHLADA RAO, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 72 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

4. K.B.GANESH, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 69 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

RESPONDENT NO.2 TP 4 ALL AT NO. 372/1, M.K PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

HC-KAR

…RESPONDENTS

THIS CRP FILED U/S. 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.07.2026, VIDE ANNEXURE B PASSED BY THE BENGALURU URBAN II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION IN EX. A. NO. 107/2022, EVEN AFTER PAYMENT OF RS. 1,22,000/- DATED 01.07.2026 UNDER DD NO. 048464 ISSUED TO THE DHR COUNSEL.

IN CRP NO. 678/2026

BETWEEN:

M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.372/1, M K PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

REPRESENTED BY N.S.MUKUNDA, M.D. ALSO AT NO.23, 2ND FLOOR, INDUSIND BANK, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 019

ALSO AT NO.SF-1, SOUTH END SAMPURNA APARTMENT, 11/94, MODEL HOUSE STREET, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 019 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. H RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SRI P GANESH

HC-KAR

S/O LATE.P.VITTAL DAS CHADAGA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT NO.1538, 1ST CROSS, 10TH MAIN, HAL III STAGE, BANGALORE – 560 008

REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MR.N.G.SHARATH KUMAR, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA UDUPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, MANDARA, 1ST MAIN TELECOM HBCS LAYOUT, SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 061

2. K.P.NARASIMHA MURTHY, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 54 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

3. PRAHLADA RAO, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 72 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

4. K.B.GANESH, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 69 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

RESPONDENT NO.2 TP 4 ALL AT NO. 372/1, M.K PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

...RESPONDENTS

THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO

HC-KAR

SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.07.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE - B PASSED BY THE BANGALORE URBAN II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION IN EX.A. NO.104/2022, EVEN AFTER PAYMENT OF RS.86,000/- DATED 01.07.2026 UNDER DD NO.048467 ISSUED TO THE DHR COUNSEL. IN CRP NO. 679/2026

BETWEEN:

M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.372/1, M K PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

REPRESENTED BY N.S.MUKUNDA, M.D. ALSO AT NO.23, 2ND FLOOR, INDUSIND BANK, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 019

ALSO AT NO.SF-1, SOUTH END SAMPURNA APARTMENT, 11/94, MODEL HOUSE STREET, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 01 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. H RAMACHANDRA.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SRI N.G.SHARATH KUMAR S/O GOPAL KRISHNA UDUPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT NO.28, MANDARA, 1ST MAIN, TELECOM HBCS LAYOUT, CARE SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD,

HC-KAR

BANGALORE – 560 061

2. K.P.NARASIMHA MURTHY, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 54 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

3. PRAHLADA RAO, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 72 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

4. K.B.GANESH, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 69 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

RESPONDENT NO.2 TP 4 ALL AT NO. 372/1, M.K PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

...RESPONDENTS

THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.07.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE - B PASSED BY THE BANGALORE URBAN II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION IN EX.A. NO.105/2022, EVEN AFTER PAYMENT OF RS.1,20,000/- DATED 01.07.2026 UNDER DD NO.048465 ISSUED TO THE DHR COUNSEL. IN CRP NO. 680/2026

BETWEEN:

M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS OFFICE AT

HC-KAR

NO.372/1, M.K. PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

REPRESENTED BY N.S.MUKUNDA, M.D.

ALSO AT NO.23, 2ND FLOOR, INDUSIND BANK, BULL TEMPLE ROAD, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 019

ALSO AT NO.SF-1, SOUTH END SAMPURNA APARTMENT, 11/94, MODEL HOUSE STREET, BASAVANGUDI, BANGALORE – 560 019 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. H RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1. SRI PRAVIN K. KULKARNI S/O SRI. KRISHNA KULKARNI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT NO.868, 2ND H CROSS, 8TH B MAIN, 3RD BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, BASAVESHWARNAGAR BANGALORE – 560 008

REPRESENTED BY HIS GPA HOLDER MR.N.G.SHARATH KUMAR, S/O GOPALA KRISHNA UDUPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,

1ST MAIN TELECOM HBCS LAYOUT, SUBRAMANYAPURA MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE-560 061

2. K.P.NARASIMHA MURTHY,

HC-KAR

DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 54 YEARS

3. PRAHLADA RAO, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 72 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

4. K.B.GANESH, DIRECTOR, M/S SNEHA TOWNSHIPS PVT LTD., AGE 69 YEARS S/O NOT KNOWN

RESPONDENTS NOS.2 TO 4 ARE RESIDING AT NO. 372/1, M.K PUTTALINGAIAH RD,

...RESPONDENTS

THIS CRP FILED UNDER SEC.115 OF CPC., PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.07.2026 VIDE ANNEXURE - B PASSED BY THE BANGALORE URBAN II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION IN EX.A. NO.106/2022, EVEN AFTER PAYMENT OF RS.92,000/- DATED 01.07.2026 UNDER DD NO.048466 ISSUED TO THE DHR COUNSEL.

THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

HC-KAR

ORAL COMMON ORDER CRP.No.672/2026 is filed against order dated 02.07.2026 in Ex.A.107/2022, CRP.No.678/2026 is filed against order dated 02.07.2026 in Ex.A.104/2022, CRP.No.679/2026 is filed against order dated 02.07.2026 in Ex.A.105/2022 & CRP.No.680/2026 is filed against order dated 02.07.2026 in Ex.A.106/2022 passed by the II Additional District Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission, Bangalore. Against this order, the petitioner has filed CRP’s under Section 115 of CPC, and he relies on the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Radhey Shyam Guptha Vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr1 and also a judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of M/s/Megacity Builders Petitioner Vs. A.P. State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission2. Section 115 of CPC, which reads thus:

115. Revision. [(1)] The High Court may call for the record of any case which has been decided by any Court subordinate to such High Court and in which no appeal lies thereto, and if such subordinate Court appears- 1 AIR 2009 SCC 930 2 AIR 2004 Andhra Pradesh 49

HC-KAR

(a) to have exercised a jurisdiction not vested in it by law, or (b) to have failed to exercise a jurisdiction so vested, or

(c) to have acted in the exercise of its jurisdiction illegally or with material irregularity, the High Court may make such order in the case as it thinks fit:

2. The Consumer Disputes and Redressal Commission is not a Court subordinate to the High Court, and the Civil Revision Petitions are filed under Section 115 of CPC before this Court is not maintainable. Hence, this office objection is raised with regard to maintainability is sustained and the petitioner shall avail the appropriate remedy.

3. Accordingly, this Court, is passing the following:

ORDER

i. Accordingly, all the Civil Revision Petition’s are disposed of with a liberty to avail the appropriate remedy.

ii. Pending I.As in all the petition’s shall stand closed.

Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 113