Karnataka High Court

WP/23592/2026 of SMT USHADEVI K Vs SRI B H MANJUNATH on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010519002026 NC: 2026:KHC:41921 WP No. 23592 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 23592 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT USHADEVI K W/O SRI SATISH KUMAR A M AGED

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

WRIT PETITION NO. 23592 OF 2026 (GM-CPC)

BETWEEN:

SMT USHADEVI K

W/O SRI SATISH KUMAR A M

AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS

RA/T NO. 309, 6TH MAIN

2ND CROSS, COFFEE BOARD LAYOUT

HEBBAL KEMPAPURA

BENGALURU - 560 024

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. MAHESH C.M., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

SRI B H MANJUNATH

S/O LATE HIMAKARAN K.S.

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

RA/TNO. 108/15 N,

5TH MAIN GANGANAGAR

BENGALURU - 560 032

2.

SRI SATHISH KUMAR A M

S/O RAJANNA

AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS

R/AT NO. 309, 6TH MAIN

2ND CROSS, COFFEE BOARD LAYOUT

HEBBAL KEMPAPURA

BENGALURU - 560 024

…RESPONDENTS

Digitally

signed by

SUVARNA T

Location:

HIGH COURT

OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) QUASHING THE

ORDER DATED 15/07/2026 PASSED BY THE LEARNED 1ST

ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE (CCH-2), BENGALURU, IN O.S. NO.6246/2022 ON I.A. NO.9 VIDE

ANNEXURE-A.

THIS

PETITION,

COMING

ON

FOR

PRELIMINARY

HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Aggrieved by the order passed in O.S.No.6246/2022 dated 15.07.2026 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, the petitioner is before this Court

2. The petitioner, who is the tenant, is before this Court, and respondent No.1 has filed the suit. In the said suit, the parties have entered into a compromise. As per the compromise, the petitioner is required to deliver possession of the property by 14.08.2026. It is the case of the petitioner that his daughter’s marriage is scheduled to be held on 30.10.2026. Hence, he is seeking an extension of time to vacate the

HC-KAR

scheduled premises. Accordingly, he has filed an application under Section 151 of the CPC before the trial Court. By the impugned order, the trial Court has dismissed the application.

3. While dismissing the application, the Trial Court has observed that, after contesting the suit for four years, the defendants, under a compromise petition, agreed to vacate the scheduled premises. The compromise was entered into before the Lok Adalat. The Trial Court has no jurisdiction to review the decision of the Lok Adalat. Hence, both parties are bound by and directed to abide by the terms of the compromise.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has not made any independent request. He submits that, as the daughter's marriage is fixed, he may be granted reasonable time to deliver possession of the house. He further submits that the trial Court has failed to consider this.

5. This is an award passed by the Lok Adalat. If there is any violation of the award, the only remedy available is to seek its execution, and the Court cannot interfere with the

HC-KAR

award, modify, alter, or extend the terms and conditions of the said compromise decree.

6. If that is the same, the litigation will have no end. In the considered opinion of this Court, the Trial Court has rightly dismissed the application, and there is no ground to interfere with the impugned order. In view of the above discussions, this Court is passing the following:

ORDER

i. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

ii. Pending IAs, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE

SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead