Karnataka High Court

CRL.RP/899/2026 of M/S SOORYOHAM MARKETING AND PVT LTD., Vs SRI SHIVANANDA NAIK on 6 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

CNR: KAHC010373652026 NC: 2026:KHC:41543 CRL.RP No. 899 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.899 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. M/S SOORYOHAM MARKETING AND PVT LTD. HAVING

HC-KAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.899 OF 2026

BETWEEN:

1.

M/S SOORYOHAM MARKETING AND PVT LTD.

HAVING OFFICE AT R/AT ‘KOCHUPARAMBIL’

KALKOONTHAZ VILLAGE, THULASIPPARA

ERRATTAYAR POST, UDUMBANCHOLA

IDDUKI DISTICT, KERALA-665514

REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR

DR.SOORYA JEWELL

2.

DR.SOORYA JEWELL

SON OF K.P.GOPI

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

R/AT ‘KOCHUPARAMBIL’

KALKOONTHAZ VILLAGE

THULASIPPARA

ERRATTAYAR POST

UDUMBANCHOLA

IDDUKI DISTICT

KERALA-665514

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. PUNITH C, ADVOCATE)

AND:

SRI SHIVANANDA NAIK

SON OF MAHABALESHWARA NAIK

AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS

Digitally signed

by DEVIKA M

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

HC-KAR

R/AT NO.37, BANASHANKARI NILAYA

6TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN

BABUBALINAGAR, JALAHALLI

BANGALORE-560013

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. RAMESHA H C, ADVOCATE)

THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED

U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT, CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED

09.12.2024 PASSED IN C.C.NO.20596/2018 BY THE LEARNED

XII A.C.M.M, BENGALURU AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

The petitioner and the respondent along with their respective counsels are present.

2. The petitioner and the respondent have filed a joint memo reporting the settlement. In terms of the joint memo, the petitioner has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.8 lakh in total to the respondent. As such, Rs.2,00,000/- is initial deposit before the Trial Court and the same has been withdrawn by the respondent. Demand Draft for Rs.5,00,000/- dated 05.08.2026 is handed over to the respondent before the Court and cash of

HC-KAR

Rs.1,00,000/- is also paid to the respondent before the Court and the same has been acknowledged by the respondent. Hence, there is no due in payment as per the settlement.

3. In view of the settlement arrived between the parties, the petition is disposed of.

4. The petitioner is directed to pay the fine amount of Rs.5,000/- as ordered by the Trial Court within two weeks from today and produce the receipt for having paid the said fine amount before the registry within a week thereafter failing which, list the matter before the Court on 28.08.2026.

Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE

SN

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead